Literature DB >> 15383481

Antithrombotic therapy in valvular heart disease--native and prosthetic: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Deeb N Salem1, Paul D Stein, Amin Al-Ahmad, Henry I Bussey, Dieter Horstkotte, Nancy Miller, Stephen G Pauker.   

Abstract

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy in native and prosthetic valvular heart disease is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), or a history of previous systemic embolism, we recommend long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy (target international normalized ratio [INR], 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1C+]. For patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease with AF or a history of systemic embolism who suffer systemic embolism while receiving OACs at a therapeutic INR, we recommend adding aspirin, 75 to 100 mg/d (Grade 1C). For those patients unable to take aspirin, we recommend adding dipyridamole, 400 mg/d, or clopidogrel (Grade 1C). In people with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) without history of systemic embolism, unexplained transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), or AF, we recommended against any antithrombotic therapy (Grade 1C). In patients with MVP and documented but unexplained TIAs, we recommend long-term aspirin therapy, 50 to 162 mg/d (Grade 1A). For all patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves, we recommend vitamin K antagonists (Grade 1C+). For patients with a St. Jude Medical (St. Paul, MN) bileaflet valve in the aortic position, we recommend a target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A]. For patients with tilting disk valves and bileaflet mechanical valves in the mitral position, we recommend a target INR of 3.0 (range, 2.5 to 3.5) [Grade 1C+]. For patients with caged ball or caged disk valves, we suggest a target INR of 3.0 (range, 2.5 to 3.5) in combination with aspirin, 75 to 100 mg/d (Grade 2A). For patients with bioprosthetic valves, we recommend vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) for the first 3 months after valve insertion in the mitral position (Grade 1C+) and in the aortic position (Grade 2C). For patients with bioprosthetic valves who are in sinus rhythm and do not have AF, we recommend long-term (> 3 months) therapy with aspirin, 75 to 100 mg/d (Grade 1C+).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383481     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.457S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  61 in total

1.  Bridging for an isolated subtherapeutic INR: an evaluation of clinical practice patterns, outcomes, and costs from an anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Jamie M Hwang; Thomas N Taylor; Krishna P Sharma; Jennifer L Clemente; Candice L Garwood
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Oral anticoagulation and VKORC1 polymorphism in patients with a mechanical heart prosthesis: a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Carlo Giansante; Nicola Fiotti; Nicola Altamura; Paola Pitacco; Lara Consoloni; Sabino Scardi; Carmine Mazzone; Gabriele Grassi; Claudio Pandullo; Andrea Di Lenarda
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  The management of patients who require temporary reversal of vitamin K antagonists for surgery: a practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Caterina Mannucci; James D Douketis
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  The value of rhythm control in mitral stenosis.

Authors:  G Karthikeyan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Antithrombotic treatment in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  L Kalra; G Y H Lip
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  [Aortic stenosis].

Authors:  W G Daniel; H Baumgartner; C Gohlke-Bärwolf; P Hanrath; D Horstkotte; K C Koch; A Mügge; H J Schäfers; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Thrombolysis as first choice therapy in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis. A study of 68 patients.

Authors:  Fidel Manuel Cáceres-Lóriga; Horacio Pérez-López; Karel Morlans-Hernández; Humberto Facundo-Sánchez; José Santos-Gracia; Juan Valiente-Mustelier; Felipe Rodiles-Aldana; Maria Acelia Marrero-Mirayaga; Blas Y Betancourt; Pedro López-Saura
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Marantic endocarditis and paraneoplastic pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Tiago Lobo Ferreira; Rosa Alves; Tiago Judas; Maria F Delerue
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-14

9.  Interactions between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Stefano Urbinati; Enrica Perugini; Simona Gambetti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  A cross-sectional study of the Anticoagulation Clinic in RIPAS Hospital, Brunei.

Authors:  Linda Y Y Lim; Vui Heng Chong; Nallathamby Rajendran; Wai See Wong
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.