Literature DB >> 15382768

Quality of life after esophageal surgery.

Hiran C Fernando1, James D Luketich.   

Abstract

QOL measurement is being reported with increasing frequency in the surgical literature. The authors and others have found that the use of a generic instrument such as the SF36 used in combination with a disease-specific instrument will provide the most comprehensive information. GERD is a significant health problem that primarily affects the QOL of a large segment of the population. New therapies for GERD continue to be developed and introduced into clinical practice. QOL assessment should be an important part of the evaluation of these new therapies. Similarly, the management of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia is also controversial. QOL assessment should be a crucial factor in determining which surgical or nonoperative approach is used for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382768     DOI: 10.1016/S1547-4127(04)00024-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin            Impact factor:   1.750


  3 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction after 2-field versus 3-field lymph node dissection in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Misuzu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Kido; Yoshinori Hosoya; Masahiko Yano; Hideo Nagai; Morito Monden
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Böttger; A Terzic; M Müller; A Rodehorst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.453

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.