Literature DB >> 15382102

Randomized clinical trial of four-layer and short-stretch compression bandages for venous leg ulcers (VenUS I).

E A Nelson1, C P Iglesias, N Cullum, D J Torgerson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to determine the relative effectiveness of four-layer and short-stretch bandaging for venous ulceration.
METHODS: A total of 387 adults with a venous ulcer, who were receiving leg ulcer treatment either in primary care or as a hospital outpatient, were recruited to this parallel-group open study and randomized to either four-layer or short-stretch bandages. Follow-up continued until the patient's reference leg was ulcer free or for a minimum of 12 months. The primary endpoint was time to complete healing of all ulcers on the reference leg. Secondary outcomes included proportion of ulcers healed, health-related quality of life, withdrawals and adverse events. Analysis was by intention to treat.
RESULTS: Unadjusted analysis identified no statistically significant difference in median time to healing: 92 days for four-layer and 126 days for short-stretch bandages. However, when prognostic factors were included in a Cox proportional hazards regression model, ulcers treated with the short-stretch bandage had a lower probability of healing than those treated with the four-layer bandage: hazard ratio 0.72 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.57 to 0.91). More adverse events and withdrawals were reported with the short-stretch bandage.
CONCLUSION: Venous leg ulcers treated using a four-layer bandage healed more quickly than those treated with a short-stretch bandage. Copyright (c) 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382102     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  16 in total

Review 1.  Venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  E Andrea Nelson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-12-21

2.  The effectiveness of a four-layer compression bandage system in comparison with Class 3 compression hosiery on healing and quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathleen J Finlayson; Mary D Courtney; Michelle A Gibb; Jane A O'Brien; Christina N Parker; Helen E Edwards
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  A single-arm trial indirect comparison investigation: a proof-of-concept method to predict venous leg ulcer healing time for a new acellular synthetic matrix matched to standard care control.

Authors:  Ronald Shannon; Andrea Nelson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Improving venous ulcer healing: designing and reporting randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; John McNeil; Sue Evans; Christopher Reid
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  E Andrea Nelson; June Jones
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-15

6.  A randomised controlled 8-week crossover clinical evaluation of the 3M Coban 2 Layer Compression System versus Profore to evaluate the product performance in patients with venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Christine J Moffatt; Lynfa Edwards; Mark Collier; Terry Treadwell; Michael Miller; Laura Shafer; Gary Sibbald; Alain Brassard; Andrea McIntosh; Alex Reyzelman; Patricia Price; Stacia Merkel Kraus; Shelley-Ann Walters; Keith Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers.

Authors:  E Andrea Nelson; Sally E M Bell-Syer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 8.  Compression for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Nicky Cullum; E Andrea Nelson; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

9.  Cost-effectiveness of compression technologies for evidence-informed leg ulcer care: results from the Canadian Bandaging Trial.

Authors:  Ba' Pham; Margaret B Harrison; Maggie H Chen; Meg E Carley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy to treat grade III/IV pressure ulcers [ISRCTN69032034].

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Elizabeth McGinnis; Nikki Stubbs; David J Torgerson; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.