Literature DB >> 15381792

Rheumatology outcomes: the patient's perspective. A multicentre focus group interview study of Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients.

M Ahlmén1, U Nordenskiöld, B Archenholtz, I Thyberg, R Rönnqvist, L Lindén, A-K Andersson, K Mannerkorpi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and clinicians have different views about benefits from treatments. More knowledge is needed about how patients assess outcomes in order to update current measurements.
METHODS: Focus group interviews were performed at four Swedish rheumatology clinics. A total of 25 patients with RA were included, representing a wide range of ages and disease duration. Predetermined topics relating to important outcomes from and satisfaction/dissatisfaction with RA treatments were discussed.
RESULTS: The participants' initial outcome assessments included physical and psychosocial items, which comprised overall treatment goals such as impairment in social roles, fatigue, daily activities and self-confidence. The identified themes were 'Normal life', 'Physical capacity', 'Independence' and 'Well-being'. Satisfaction with treatment was associated with the quality of communication between staff and the patient. The participants assumed this as a prerequisite for a treatment to work. Patients wanted to be accepted as experts on their own bodies, and expected all clinicians to be experts on RA. This made it possible for patients to 'take charge' of their life situation. Good resources for and access to rheumatology care were desired.
CONCLUSIONS: Suggesting a holistic approach to rheumatology care, the study results indicate that the illness and outcomes have to be evaluated within an individual RA patient's total life situation, described in the identified themes: 'Normal life', 'Physical capacity', 'Independence' and 'Well-being'. Development and validation of measurements covering these issues is suggested. More research is needed about communication and how patients experience their roles in the rheumatology clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15381792     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  53 in total

1.  Peripheral and central mechanisms of fatigue in inflammatory and noninflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Roland Staud
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Updating the OMERACT filter: core areas as a basis for defining core outcome sets.

Authors:  John R Kirwan; Maarten Boers; Sarah Hewlett; Dorcas Beaton; Clifton O Bingham; Ernest Choy; Philip G Conaghan; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Maxime Dougados; Daniel E Furst; Francis Guillemin; Laure Gossec; Désirée M van der Heijde; Margreet Kloppenburg; Tore K Kvien; Robert B M Landewé; Sarah L Mackie; Eric L Matteson; Philip J Mease; Peter A Merkel; Mikkel Ostergaard; Lesley Ann Saketkoo; Lee Simon; Jasvinder A Singh; Vibeke Strand; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 3.  Patient goals in rheumatoid arthritis care: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hulen; Ayla Ervin; Allison Schue; Gina Evans-Young; Somnath Saha; Edward H Yelin; Jennifer L Barton
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2016-12-14

4.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods.

Authors:  Michaela Coenen; Tanja A Stamm; Gerold Stucki; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists approach the decision to escalate care differently: results of a maximum difference scaling experiment.

Authors:  L T C van Hulst; W Kievit; R van Bommel; P L C M van Riel; L Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Changes in priorities for improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 1 year of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment.

Authors:  Peter M ten Klooster; Martine M Veehof; Erik Taal; Piet L C M van Riel; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Expectations of new treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: developing a patient-generated questionnaire.

Authors:  Darija Hofmann; Fowzia Ibrahim; Diana Rose; David L Scott; Andrew Cope; Til Wykes; Heidi Lempp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patients' independence of a nurse for the administration of subcutaneous anti-TNF therapy: A phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Ingrid Larsson; Stefan Bergman; Bengt Fridlund; Barbro Arvidsson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2010-06-30

9.  Paid work is associated with improved health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kjersti Grønning; Erik Rødevand; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  [EULAR recommendations for patient education of people with inflammatory arthritis. Translation and evaluation in Germany].

Authors:  J Patermann; I Ehlebracht-König; G Lind-Albrecht; E Genth; A Reusch; R Küffner; U Müller-Ladner; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.