Literature DB >> 15380997

Accommodation responses to stimuli in cone contrast space.

Frances J Rucker1, Philip B Kruger.   

Abstract

The aim was to identify the cone contributions and pathways for reflex accommodation. Twelve illumination conditions were used to test specified locations in cone-contrast space. Accommodation was monitored continuously in a Badal optometer while the grating stimulus (2.2 c/d sine-wave; 0.27 modulation) moved sinusoidally (0.195 Hz) towards and away from the eye from a mean position of 2.00 D (+/-1.00 D). Mean accommodation level and dynamic gain and phase at 0.195 Hz were calculated. Mean accommodation level varied significantly when the long- and middle-wavelength cone contrast ratio was altered in both the luminance and chromatic quadrants of cone-contrast space. This experiment indicates that L- and M-cones contribute to luminance and chromatic signals that produce the accommodation response, most likely through magno-cellular and parvo-cellular pathways, respectively. The L:M cone weighting to the luminance pathway that mediates accommodation is 1.63:1. The amplitude and direction of the response depends on changes in chromatic contrast and luminance contrast signals that result from longitudinal chromatic aberration and defocus of the image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15380997     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: differential responses to short and long wavelengths.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Effect of even and odd-order aberrations on the accommodation response.

Authors:  Aikaterini I Moulakaki; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Austin Roorda; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Effects of age on dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Thurmon E Lockhart; Wen Shi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Accommodation to wavefront vergence and chromatic aberration.

Authors:  Yinan Wang; Philip B Kruger; James S Li; Peter L Lin; Lawrence R Stark
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Chick eyes compensate for chromatic simulations of hyperopic and myopic defocus: evidence that the eye uses longitudinal chromatic aberration to guide eye-growth.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The effects of longitudinal chromatic aberration and a shift in the peak of the middle-wavelength sensitive cone fundamental on cone contrast.

Authors:  F J Rucker; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.