Literature DB >> 15379741

Superior sensitivity of motor over somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

M Simó1, I Szirmai, Z Arányi.   

Abstract

Myelopathy secondary to cervical spondylosis is often a difficult clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, with the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) an increasing number of patients are identified with spondylotic cervical spinal cord compression. We analyzed the value of functional assessment of the spinal cord by motor and sensory evoked potentials (MEP and SEP) in the detection of myelopathy, with special emphasis on the correlation of clinical and electrophysiological findings. Fifty-one patients with at least some degree of spinal cord compression because of cervical spondylosis, as shown by MRI, were included in the study, grouped according to clinical symptoms. We found that patients who had no clinical symptoms whatsoever indicating myelopathy (they were referred to MRI examination mostly because of cervical radiculopathy), had in the large majority normal MEP and SEP findings. Patients with slight, unspecific and non-confirmative symptoms without pyramidal signs had mostly abnormal MEP but normal SEP findings. This points to the superior sensitivity of MEP over SEP in detecting myelopathy in its early stages. Patients with obvious clinical signs of myelopathy, including pyramidal signs had both abnormal MEP and SEP findings. Altogether these findings may help clinicians in interpreting MRI signs of cervical spinal cord compression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15379741     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00863.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Spondylotic cervical myelopathy : Indication of surgical treatment].

Authors:  W Pepke; H Almansour; M Richter; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Correlation of force control with regional spinal DTI in patients with cervical spondylosis without signs of spinal cord injury on conventional MRI.

Authors:  Påvel G Lindberg; Katherine Sanchez; Fidan Ozcan; François Rannou; Serge Poiraudeau; Antoine Feydy; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials during the early and reversible stage of permanent spinal cord ischemia predict spinal cord injury in a rabbit animal model.

Authors:  Mingguang Wang; Fanguo Meng; Qimin Song; Jian Zhang; Chao Dai; Qingyan Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Is microdiffusion imaging able to improve the detection of cervical myelopathy? Study protocol of a prospective observational trial (MIDICAM-Trial).

Authors:  Marc Hohenhaus; Karl Egger; Jan-Helge Klingler; Ulrich Hubbe; Marco Reisert; Katharina Wolf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Optimizing the Application of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 10].

Authors:  Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto; Thiago S Montenegro; Benjamin M Davies; So Kato; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Manabu Ito; Mehmet Zileli; Brian K Kwon; Michael G Fehlings; Paul A Koljonen; Shekar N Kurpad; James D Guest; Bizhan Aarabi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Jefferson R Wilson; Mark R N Kotter; James S Harrop
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02

Review 7.  Application of electrophysiological measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhengran Yu; Wenxu Pan; Jiacheng Chen; Xinsheng Peng; Zemin Ling; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-08-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.