Literature DB >> 15378617

Intramolecular carbohydrate-aromatic interactions and intermolecular van der Waals interactions enhance the molecular recognition ability of GM1 glycomimetics for cholera toxin.

Anna Bernardi1, Daniela Arosio, Donatella Potenza, Inmaculada Sánchez-Medina, Silvia Mari, F Javier Cañada, Jesús Jiménez-Barbero.   

Abstract

The design and synthesis of two GM1 glycomimetics, 6 and 7, and analysis of their conformation in the free state and when complexed to cholera toxin is described. These compounds, which include an (R)-cyclohexyllactic acid and an (R)-phenyllactic acid fragment, respectively, display significant affinity for cholera toxin. A detailed NMR spectroscopy study of the toxin/glycomimetic complexes, assisted by molecular modeling techniques, has allowed their interactions with the toxin to be explained at the atomic level. It is shown that intramolecular van der Waals and CH-pi carbohydrate-aromatic interactions define the conformational properties of 7, which adopts a three-dimensional structure significantly preorganized for proper interaction with the toxin. The exploitation of this kind of sugar-aromatic interaction, which is very well described in the context of carbohydrate/protein complexes, may open new avenues for the rational design of sugar mimics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15378617     DOI: 10.1002/chem.200400084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  8 in total

Review 1.  STD-NMR: application to transient interactions between biomolecules-a quantitative approach.

Authors:  Jesus Angulo; Pedro M Nieto
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Non-carbohydrate inhibitors of the lectin DC-SIGN.

Authors:  M Jack Borrok; Laura L Kiessling
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  The interaction of La(3+) complexes of DOTA/DTPA glycoconjugates with the RCA(120) lectin: a saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopic study.

Authors:  João M C Teixeira; David M Dias; F Javier Cañada; José A Martins; João P André; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero; Carlos F G C Geraldes
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 4.  CH-π Interactions in Glycan Recognition.

Authors:  Laura L Kiessling; Roger C Diehl
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Carbohydrate-pi interactions: what are they worth?

Authors:  Zachary R Laughrey; Sarah E Kiehna; Alex J Riemen; Marcey L Waters
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Stacking interactions between carbohydrate and protein quantified by combination of theoretical and experimental methods.

Authors:  Michaela Wimmerová; Stanislav Kozmon; Ivona Nečasová; Sushil Kumar Mishra; Jan Komárek; Jaroslav Koča
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exploring Multi-Subsite Binding Pockets in Proteins: DEEP-STD NMR Fingerprinting and Molecular Dynamics Unveil a Cryptic Subsite at the GM1 Binding Pocket of Cholera Toxin B.

Authors:  Serena Monaco; Samuel Walpole; Hassan Doukani; Ridvan Nepravishta; Macarena Martínez-Bailén; Ana T Carmona; Javier Ramos-Soriano; Maria Bergström; Inmaculada Robina; Jesus Angulo
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 8.  Protein-carbohydrate interactions studied by NMR: from molecular recognition to drug design.

Authors:  Maria del Carmen Fernández-Alonso; Dolores Díaz; Manuel Álvaro Berbis; Filipa Marcelo; Javier Cañada; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.272

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.