Literature DB >> 15376793

Orthography, phonology, and meaning: word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition.

Anne M Cleary1.   

Abstract

In the present study, it is shown that participants can recognize test cues as resembling studied words even when these cues cannot be used to recall the words that they resemble. After studying a list of words, participants were given a cued recall test for which half of the cues resembled studied words on one particular feature dimension and half resembled nonstudied words on that dimension. In addition to trying to use each cue to recall a study list item, participants rated the degree to which the cue resembled a studied word. For those cues whose targets could not be identified, the mean rating was higher when the cues corresponded to studied items than when they corresponded to nonstudied items. Various types of features can give rise to this phenomenon, which was found when orthographic, phonemic, and semantic cued recall tasks were used. In all of these cases of recognition without recall, analysis of receiver operating characteristics revealed a pattern consistent with that of an equal-variance signal detection process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376793     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: the relationship between presentation duration and slope.

Authors:  E Hirshman; M Hostetter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Authors:  S E Clark; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

3.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Tindall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Judgments for inaccessible targets: comparing recognition without identification and the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  Jason S Nomi; Anne M Cleary
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Anthony J Ryals; Samantha R Wagner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Relating familiarity-based recognition and the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: detecting a word's recency in the absence of access to the word.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Familiarity from orthographic information: extensions of the recognition without identification effect.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

5.  Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: toward specifying familiarity for compound words.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; Alan S Brown; Paul Atchley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  Can deja vu result from similarity to a prior experience? Support for the similarity hypothesis of deja vu.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Anthony J Ryals; Jason S Nomi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

7.  Recall versus familiarity when recall fails for words and scenes: the differential roles of the hippocampus, perirhinal cortex, and category-specific cortical regions.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Anne M Cleary; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Recognition without picture identification: geons as components of the pictorial memory trace.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Moses M Langley; Kevin R Seiler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

9.  Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Recognition without face identification.

Authors:  Anne M Clary; Laura E Specker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.