Alberto Corona1, A Peter R Wilson, Mario Grassi, Mervyn Singer. 1. Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, Jules Thorn Building, Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer Street, London W1N 3AA. corona.alberto@libero.it
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As optimal antibiotic therapy for bacteraemia remains unknown, different strategies have evolved. Routine practice in the University College London Hospitals intensive care unit (ICU) is to use short-course (5-6 days) monotherapy, unless specifically indicated (e.g. endocarditis, osteomyelitis). We decided to assess this approach for treating community-, hospital-, and ICU-acquired bacteraemia by monitoring clinical response, relapse rate and patient outcome. DESIGN: Six-month prospective observational study from February to July 2000. SETTING: Mixed medical-surgical tertiary referral ICU. PATIENTS: All 713 patients admitted to the ICU over the study period. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In total, 102 bacteraemic episodes occurred in 84 patients. Eight (57%) of 14 community-acquired bacteraemias, 22 (79%) of 28 hospital-acquired bacteraemias, and 48 (80%) of 60 ICU-acquired bacteraemias (in 49 patients) were treated with short-course monotherapy. Compared with previous reported studies, these patients had a low rate (23.8%) of death directly attributable to the bacteraemia and a satisfactory clinical response in 72%. Of six relapses (all Gram-negative), four had received combination therapy for severe deep-seated infections. ICU-acquired multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteraemias (6.5%) and fungaemias (3%) were also uncommon. No patient discharged from ICU subsequently developed a new bacteraemia relapse, or any long-term complication such as osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our general strategy of short-course antibiotic monotherapy for treating bacteraemia in the critically ill appears to provide a satisfactory clinical response, low relapse rate and no long-term complications in a well-defined group of patients. Multicentre studies are warranted to compare short versus long course therapy, and monotherapy versus combination therapy.
OBJECTIVE: As optimal antibiotic therapy for bacteraemia remains unknown, different strategies have evolved. Routine practice in the University College London Hospitals intensive care unit (ICU) is to use short-course (5-6 days) monotherapy, unless specifically indicated (e.g. endocarditis, osteomyelitis). We decided to assess this approach for treating community-, hospital-, and ICU-acquired bacteraemia by monitoring clinical response, relapse rate and patient outcome. DESIGN: Six-month prospective observational study from February to July 2000. SETTING: Mixed medical-surgical tertiary referral ICU. PATIENTS: All 713 patients admitted to the ICU over the study period. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In total, 102 bacteraemic episodes occurred in 84 patients. Eight (57%) of 14 community-acquired bacteraemias, 22 (79%) of 28 hospital-acquired bacteraemias, and 48 (80%) of 60 ICU-acquired bacteraemias (in 49 patients) were treated with short-course monotherapy. Compared with previous reported studies, these patients had a low rate (23.8%) of death directly attributable to the bacteraemia and a satisfactory clinical response in 72%. Of six relapses (all Gram-negative), four had received combination therapy for severe deep-seated infections. ICU-acquired multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteraemias (6.5%) and fungaemias (3%) were also uncommon. No patient discharged from ICU subsequently developed a new bacteraemia relapse, or any long-term complication such as osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our general strategy of short-course antibiotic monotherapy for treating bacteraemia in the critically ill appears to provide a satisfactory clinical response, low relapse rate and no long-term complications in a well-defined group of patients. Multicentre studies are warranted to compare short versus long course therapy, and monotherapy versus combination therapy.
Authors: Darunee Chotiprasitsakul; Jennifer H Han; Sara E Cosgrove; Anthony D Harris; Ebbing Lautenbach; Anna T Conley; Pam Tolomeo; Jacqueleen Wise; Pranita D Tamma Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nick Culshaw; Guy Glover; Craig Whiteley; Katie Rowland; Duncan Wyncoll; Andrew Jones; Manu Shankar-Hari Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Angela Huttner; Werner C Albrich; Pierre-Yves Bochud; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Anne Rossel; Elodie von Dach; Stephan Harbarth; Laurent Kaiser Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 2.692