Literature DB >> 15374972

5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-induced cdc25A accumulation correlates with premature mitotic entry and clonogenic death in human colon cancer cells.

Leslie Anne Parsels1, Joshua David Parsels, Daniel Chung-Ho Tai, Daniel James Coughlin, Jonathan Maybaum.   

Abstract

The ability to inappropriately progress through S phase during drug treatment is a key determinant of tumor cell sensitivity to thymidylate synthase inhibitors such as 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd). Previous studies suggest that SW620 cells, which are relatively resistant to FdUrd, have an intact early S-phase checkpoint that protects against FdUrd-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity and that this checkpoint is defective in the relatively sensitive HT29 cells, which continue to progress through S phase during drug treatment. To test this hypothesis, we examined the expression and activation of known S-phase checkpoint mediators in FdUrd-treated SW620 and HT29 cells. FdUrd induced degradation of cdc25A in SW620, but not HT29 cells, in a manner that correlated with the previously described drug-induced S-phase arrest. This difference, however, could not be attributed to differences in either chk1 activation, which was similar in both cell lines, or chk2 activation, which only occurred in HT29 cells and correlated with uracil misincorporation/misrepair-induced DNA double-stranded breaks. These observations suggest that although FdUrd-induced S-phase arrest and associated cdc25A degradation are impaired in HT29 cells, signaling by ATM/ATR is intact upstream of chk1 and chk2. Finally, FdUrd induced premature mitotic entry, a phenomenon associated with deregulated cdc25A expression, in HT29 but not SW620 cells. Blocking cdc25A expression in HT29 cells with small interfering RNA attenuated FdUrd-induced premature mitotic entry, suggesting that progression of HT29 cells through S phase during drug treatment results in part from the inability of these cells to degrade cdc25A in response to FdUrd-induced DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15374972     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  11 in total

Review 1.  Uracil in DNA: consequences for carcinogenesis and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sondra H Berger; Douglas L Pittman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition synergizes with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine but not 5-fluorouracil in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Amelia M Huehls; Jill M Wagner; Catherine J Huntoon; Liyi Geng; Charles Erlichman; Anand G Patel; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Short fluorodeoxyuridine exposure of different human glioblastoma lines induces high-level accumulation of S-phase cells that avidly incorporate 125I-iododeoxyuridine.

Authors:  Florence Perillo-Adamer; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Céline S Genton; Andreas O Schaffland; Yves M Dupertuis; Franz Buchegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Enhancement of 5-fluorouracil-induced in vitro and in vivo radiosensitization with MEK inhibition.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Urick; Eun Joo Chung; William P Shield; Naamit Gerber; Ayla White; Anastasia Sowers; Angela Thetford; Kevin Camphausen; James Mitchell; Deborah E Citrin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Expression and regulation of RAD51 mediate cellular responses to chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Zhengguan Yang; Alan S Waldman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Identification of DNA repair pathways that affect the survival of ovarian cancer cells treated with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in a novel drug combination.

Authors:  Amelia M Huehls; Jill M Wagner; Catherine J Huntoon; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Meredith A Morgan; Daria M Tanska; Joshua D Parsels; Brian D Palmer; R John Booth; William A Denny; Christine E Canman; Alan J Kraker; Theodore S Lawrence; Jonathan Maybaum
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Uracil incorporation into genomic DNA does not predict toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic inhibition of thymidylate synthase.

Authors:  Yuhong Luo; Mike Walla; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 9.  Participation of DNA repair in the response to 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  M D Wyatt; D M Wilson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  DNA damage and homologous recombination signaling induced by thymidylate deprivation.

Authors:  Zhengguan Yang; Alan S Waldman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.