Literature DB >> 15374085

Bone assessment in elderly women: what does a low bone ultrasound result tell us about bone mineral density?

A Johansen1, W Evans, M Stone.   

Abstract

Access to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can prove difficult for frail or elderly patients, and bone ultrasound may offer a practical alternative. Even after adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD), ultrasound readings are able to predict hip fracture in elderly women. We consider how bone ultrasound might contribute to bone assessment in a clinical setting. DXA remains the gold standard for bone assessment, with osteoporosis defined as a BMD result more than 2.5 S.D. below the young adult mean. Using an equivalent approach we defined an osteoporotic ultrasound result as broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)<54 dB/MHz. In 73 women aged 29-86 (mean 65) years DXA was used to measure BMD at lumbar spine and hip, and ultrasound to measure BUA at the heel. Correlation of BUA with BMD at femoral neck (r=0.64, P<0.001), and lumbar spine (r=0.55, P<0.001) was consistent with previously reported figures for this ultrasound system. All subjects with BUA below the 54 dB/MHz threshold value were shown to have low femoral neck BMD. Women (42%) aged over 65, but only 18% of younger women had low BUA results. In women over 65 years of age measurements of BUA achieved a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 100% in prediction of low femoral neck BMD. Although a normal BUA did not exclude an osteoporotic BMD result at hip or lumbar spine, a low BUA appeared a highly specific predictor of low BMD at these sites. Since all those women identified as having a low BUA at the heel also had low BMD results, ultrasound appeared to identify a subgroup of elderly patients at a very high risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15374085     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4943(99)00010-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0167-4943            Impact factor:   3.250


  5 in total

1.  Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.

Authors:  J P Karjalainen; O Riekkinen; J Töyräs; M Hakulinen; H Kröger; T Rikkonen; K Salovaara; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Frailty, osteoporosis and hip fracture: causes, consequences and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  Y Rolland; G Abellan van Kan; A Bénétos; H Blain; M Bonnefoy; P Chassagne; C Jeandel; M Laroche; F Nourhashémi; P Orcel; F Piette; C Ribot; P Ritz; C Roux; J Taillandier; F Trémollières; G Weryha; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Total vs. Bioavailable: Determining a Better 25(OH)D Index in Association with Bone Density and Muscle Mass in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Nurdiana Z Abidin; Soma R Mitra
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  Determination of Cutoff Values for the Screening of Osteosarcopenia in Obese Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Nurdiana Z Abidin; Soma R Mitra
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2021-03-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.