Literature DB >> 15373459

Optimization of two-dimensional off-line LC/MS separations to improve resolution of complex proteomic samples.

Martin Vollmer1, Patric Hörth, Edgar Nägele.   

Abstract

In off-line 2D-HPLC a continuous salt gradient is applied in the first separation dimension. This increases the number of identified proteins from complex samples significantly due to higher chromatographic resolution compared to stepwise elution. Achievement of optimal resolution requires the optimization of the two separation dimensions. The influence of LC elution gradients in the first and second dimensions, of analysis time, of stationary-phase material, and of column dimensions was systematically investigated in order to obtain information on the overall peak capacity of the separation system. Provided data indicate that for complex samples such as an E. coli cell extract, a shallow LC SCX gradient with a high number of collected fractions significantly increases the overall peak capacity while for lower complexity samples short gradients with few fractions were sufficient to obtain a maximum of identified peptides. In addition, column dimensions and materials exhibited a strong effect on the overall efficiency of the 2D HPLC separation. The outcome of these experiments could hence serve as a guideline for investigators to adapt their method for the separation of their specific proteome sample to achieve a maximum of peptide sequence information by 2D LC MS/MS analysis. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15373459     DOI: 10.1021/ac040022u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

1.  Systematical optimization of reverse-phase chromatography for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Duc M Duong; Junmin Peng
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  Multi-dimensional liquid chromatography in proteomics--a review.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Aiqin Fang; Catherine P Riley; Mu Wang; Fred E Regnier; Charles Buck
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Increasing proteome coverage with offline RP HPLC coupled to online RP nanoLC-MS.

Authors:  Emine Gokce; Genna L Andrews; Ralph A Dean; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 4.  The Escherichia coli proteome: past, present, and future prospects.

Authors:  Mee-Jung Han; Sang Yup Lee
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 5.  Advanced proteomic liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Fang Xie; Richard D Smith; Yufeng Shen
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  James A Dowell; Dustin C Frost; Jiang Zhang; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Recent developments and contributions from Chinese scientists in multidimensional separations for proteomics and traditional Chinese medicines.

Authors:  Mingxia Gao; Chunhui Deng; Shuang Lin; Fengli Hu; Jia Tang; Ning Yao; Xiangmin Zhang
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  An economical high-throughput protocol for multidimensional fractionation of proteins.

Authors:  David John Tooth; Varun Gopala Krishna; Robert Layfield
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 9.  Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) in proteomics.

Authors:  Paul J Boersema; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Analysis of histone post translational modifications in primary monocyte derived macrophages using reverse phase×reverse phase chromatography in conjunction with porous graphitic carbon stationary phase.

Authors:  Thomas C Minshull; Joby Cole; David H Dockrell; Robert C Read; Mark J Dickman
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.