Literature DB >> 15371821

Laparoscopic cryoablation of solid renal masses: intermediate term followup.

Andrea Cestari1, Giorgio Guazzoni, Vincenzo dell'Acqua, Luciano Nava, Giampiero Cardone, Giuseppe Balconi, Richard Naspro, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report our experience with laparoscopic renal cryoablation (LRC) in select cases of small renal neoplasms. We evaluated the oncological results with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since September 2000, at our department 37 patients with a mean age of 64 years (range 29 to 89) have undergone LRC for computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) documented renal masses. Mean lesion diameter was 25.7 mm (range 10 to 60). According to tumor position in 22 cases the procedure was performed transperitoneally and in 15 it was done retroperitoneoscopically. Postoperative followup included MRI on postoperative day 1, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery, and annually thereafter. Moreover, 6 months following the surgical procedure biopsy of the site of the treated neoplasm was performed.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic procedure was successfully completed in all cases. Mean operative time was 194 minutes (range 120 to 300) and mean blood loss was 165.3 ml (range 20 to 900). Final histological evaluation revealed renal cell carcinoma in 29 cases and oncocytoma in 6, while 2 were reported as indefinite. All patients were discharged home after a mean of 3.8 days (range 3 to 7) and returned to normal social life after a mean of 7.3 days (range 5 to 9). Early and postoperative complications were evaluated. Mean diameter of the cryolesion on postoperative day 1 on MRI was 48.2 mm and it progressively decreased during followup. Of the 35 patients with at least 6 months of followup computerized tomography guided biopsy was performed in 25, who were negative for neoplasm.
CONCLUSIONS: LRC for small renal masses appears to be a safe, reproducible, minimally invasive technique. Medium term followup in our series is encouraging, although further studies and prolonged followup are needed to access properly the role of this surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371821     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140073.57974.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

1.  Ultrashort intracorporeally maneuverable cryoprobes for laparoscopic renal cryoablation in the porcine model.

Authors:  Dan Leibovici; Kobi Stav; Judith Sandbank; Yoram I Siegel; Amir Cooper; Yariv Siman-Tov; Peter Schulam; Arie Lindner; Amnon Zisman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Toward Semi-autonomous Cryoablation of Kidney Tumors via Model-Independent Deformable Tissue Manipulation Technique.

Authors:  Farshid Alambeigi; Zerui Wang; Yun-Hui Liu; Russell H Taylor; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Thermoablation of Renal Masses: The Urologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Phillip H Abbosh; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation as an alternative treatment for small renal mass in patients with poor operability: experience from the Korean single center.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Hoon Choi; Sung Gu Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass : a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Byeong Kuk Ham; Sung Gu Kang; Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

7.  Cryoablation for endophytic renal cell carcinoma: intermediate-term oncologic efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Se Hong Park; Seok Ho Kang; Young Hwii Ko; Sung Gu Kang; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-08-18

Review 8.  [Energy ablative therapy of renal tumours].

Authors:  H C Klingler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Role of tumor location in selecting patients for percutaneous versus surgical cryoablation of renal masses.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Marc C Smaldone; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Boris Rozenfeld; Ervin Teper; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.344

10.  Current status of ablative therapies for renal tumors.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.