Literature DB >> 15370159

Value to smokers of improved cessation products: evidence from a willingness-to-pay survey.

Susan Busch1, Tracy Falba, Noelia Duchovny, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Stephanie O'Malley, Jody Sindelar.   

Abstract

The present study demonstrated the use of willingness to pay to value hypothetical new smoking cessation products. Data came from a baseline survey of participants in a clinical trial of medications for smoking cessation (N=356) conducted in New Haven, Connecticut. We analyzed individual willingness to pay for a hypothetical tobacco cessation treatment that is (a) more effective than those currently available and then (b) more effective and attenuates the weight gain often associated with smoking cessation. A majority of the respondents (n=280; 84%) were willing to pay for the more effective treatment, and, of those, 175 (63%) were willing to pay more if the increased effectiveness was accompanied by attenuation of the weight gain associated with smoking cessation. The present study suggests the validity of using willingness-to-pay surveys in assessing the value of new smoking cessation products and products with multifaceted improvements. From these data, we calculated estimates of the value of a quit. For the population studied, this survey suggests a substantial market for more effective smoking cessation treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370159     DOI: 10.1080/14622200410001727885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  9 in total

1.  Willingness-to-pay and demand curves: a comparison of results obtained using different elicitation formats.

Authors:  David K Whynes; Emma J Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  A 'league table' of contingent valuation results for pharmaceutical interventions: a hard pill to swallow?

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Richard D Smith; David K Whynes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A deposit contract method to deliver abstinence reinforcement for cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Steven Meredith; Irene M Glenn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

4.  Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: research achievements and future implications.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joachim Marti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-26

6.  Contingency management in the 21st century: technological innovations to promote smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  A Cross-sectional Examination of What Smokers Perceive to be Important and Their Willingness to Pay for Tobacco Cessation Medications.

Authors:  Shanta R Dube; Michael F Pesko; Xin Xu
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

8.  Initiating Pharmacologic Treatment in Tobacco-Dependent Adults. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Frank T Leone; Yuqing Zhang; Sarah Evers-Casey; A Eden Evins; Michelle N Eakin; Joelle Fathi; Kathleen Fennig; Patricia Folan; Panagis Galiatsatos; Hyma Gogineni; Stephen Kantrow; Hasmeena Kathuria; Thomas Lamphere; Enid Neptune; Manuel C Pacheco; Smita Pakhale; David Prezant; David P L Sachs; Benjamin Toll; Dona Upson; Dan Xiao; Luciane Cruz-Lopes; Izabela Fulone; Rachael L Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Sureka Pavalagantharajah; Stephanie Ross; Yuan Zhang; Meng Zhu; Harold J Farber
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Smaller Cigarette Pack as a Commitment to Smoke Less? Insights from Behavioral Economics.

Authors:  Joachim Marti; Jody Sindelar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.