Literature DB >> 15367238

Requirements for quality of life instruments in clinical research.

Lynda C Doward1, David M Meads, Hanne Thorsen.   

Abstract

The ability to produce high quality instruments for the assessment of quality of life has advanced considerably in recent years. As the science progresses it has become clear that certain standards must be met if outcome measures are to be capable of providing useful, reliable, and valid information within the context of clinical studies and trials. This paper specifies what these standards are with particular reference to theoretical basis, practicality, acceptability to respondents, unidimensionality, scaling and psychometric properties, and cultural validity and equivalence. The paper also indicates how failure to achieve such standards results in measures that are inaccurate and insensitive to true changes in outcome.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15367238     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  19 in total

1.  The 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): Is it a Unidimensional Construct?

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Maria H Nilsson
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Assessing quality of life in Crohn's disease: development and validation of the Crohn's Life Impact Questionnaire (CLIQ).

Authors:  Jeanette Wilburn; Stephen P McKenna; James Twiss; Karen Kemp; Simon Campbell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Michael Erhart; Nora Wille; Ralf Wetzel; Jennifer Nickel; Monika Bullinger
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Choosing your partner for the PROM: a review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care.

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Jennifer Davis; James Broesch; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Steven Lewis; Kim McGrail; Margaret J McGregor; Janice M Murphy; Rick Sawatzky
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-11

5.  Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Hanne Thorsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Health-related quality of life questionnaire for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOSQ-50): development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nasiri-Amiri; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Masoumeh Simbar; Ali Montazeri; Reza Ali Mohammadpour
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported information: from randomized controlled trials to the social web and beyond.

Authors:  Mike Baldwin; Andrew Spong; Lynda Doward; Ari Gnanasakthy
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The significance of importance: an evaluation of Ferrans and Powers' Quality of Life Index.

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Albert Westergren
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.440

9.  Translation and validation of non-English versions of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQOL) questionnaire.

Authors:  Lynda C Doward; Stephen P McKenna; David M Meads; James Twiss; Dennis Revicki; Robert L Wong; Michelle P Luo
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Psychometric properties of the thyroid-specific quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO in Singaporean patients with Graves' disease.

Authors:  Huiling Liew; Torquil Watt; Luo Nan; Alvin W K Tan; Yiong Huak Chan; Daniel Ek Kwang Chew; Rinkoo Dalan
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.