Literature DB >> 1536599

Monitoring and assessment of mercury pollution in the vicinity of a chloralkali plant. IV. Bioconcentration of mercury in in situ aquatic and terrestrial plants at Ganjam, India.

M Lenka1, K K Panda, B B Panda.   

Abstract

In situ aquatic and terrestrial plants including a few vegetable and crop plants growing in and around a chloralkali plant at Ganjam, India were analyzed for concentrations of root and shoot mercury. The aquatic plants found to bioconcentrate mercury to different degrees included Marsilea spp., Spirodela polyrhiza, Jussiea repens, Paspalum scrobiculatam, Pistia stratiotes, Eichhornia crassipes, Hygrophila schulli, Monochoria hastata and Bacopa monniera. Among wild terrestrial plants Chloris barbata, Cynodon dactylon, Cyperus rotundus and Croton bonplandianum were found growing on heavily contaminated soil containing mercury as high as 557 mg/kg. Analysis of mercury in root and shoot of these plants in relation to the mercury levels in soil indicated a significant correlation between soil and plant mercury with the exception of C. bonplandianum. Furthermore, the tolerance to mercury toxicity was highest with C. barbata followed by C. dactylon and C. rotundus, in that order. The rice plants analyzed from the surrounding agricultural fields did not show any significant levels of bioconcentrated mercury. Of the different vegetables grown in a contaminated kitchen garden with mercury level at 8.91 mg/kg, the two leafy vegetables, namely cabbage (Brassica oleracea) and amaranthus (Amaranthus oleraceous), were found to bioconcentrate mercury at statistically significant levels. The overall study indicates that the mercury pollution is very much localized to the specific sites in the vicinity of the chloralkali plant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1536599     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Monitoring and assessment of mercury pollution in the vicinity of a chloralkali plant. III. Concentration and genotoxicity of mercury in the industrial effluent and contaminated water of Rushikulya estuary, India.

Authors:  K K Panda; M Lenka; B B Panda
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  [Average mercury content of food products in Belgium].

Authors:  A Fouassin; M Fondu
Journal:  Arch Belg Med Soc       Date:  1978-10

3.  Allium micronucleus (MNC) assay to assess bioavailability, bioconcentration and genotoxicity of mercury from solid waste deposits of a chloralkali plant, and antagonism of L-cysteine.

Authors:  K K Panda; M Lenka; B B Panda
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Monitoring and assessment of mercury pollution in the vicinity of a chloralkali plant. II Plant-availability, tissue-concentration and genotoxicity of mercury from agricultural soil contaminated with solid waste assessed in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  K K Panda; M Lenka; B B Panda
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Mercury in fish in Swedish lakes.

Authors:  L Håkanson; A Nilsson; T Andersson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Studies on the ability of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) to bioconcentrate and biomonitor aquatic mercury.

Authors:  M Lenka; K K Panda; B B Panda
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.071

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Heavy metals in water, sediments and wetland plants in an aquatic ecosystem of tropical industrial region, India.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar Rai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Food chain transfer and potential renal toxicity of mercury to small mammals at a contaminated terrestrial field site.

Authors:  S S Talmage; B T Walton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Rice methylmercury exposure and mitigation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sarah E Rothenberg; Lisamarie Windham-Myers; Joel E Creswell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Sequestration of precious and pollutant metals in biomass of cultured water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).

Authors:  Solomon W Newete; Barend F N Erasmus; Isabel M Weiersbye; Marcus J Byrne
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Detection and quantification of unbound phytochelatin 2 in plant extracts of Brassica napus grown with different levels of mercury.

Authors:  Santiago Iglesia-Turiño; Anna Febrero; Olga Jauregui; Cristina Caldelas; Jose Luis Araus; Jordi Bort
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Accumulation of trace elements by Pistia stratiotes: implications for phytoremediation.

Authors:  V J Odjegba; I O Fasidi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Comparative assessment of Azolla pinnata and Vallisneria spiralis in Hg removal from G.B. Pant Sagar of Singrauli Industrial region, India.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar Rai; B D Tripathi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Effect of methyl mercury induced free radical stress on nucleic acids and protein: Implications on cognitive and motor functions.

Authors:  Farhana Zahir; Shameem J Rizvi; Soghra K Haq; Rizwan H Khan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.