Literature DB >> 15092669

Mercury in fish in Swedish lakes.

L Håkanson1, A Nilsson, T Andersson.   

Abstract

The aim of this work has been to try to obtain a picture of the past, present and future mercury situation in fish in Swedish lakes, to make an estimate of the number of lakes threatened by 'blacklisting', and to see if the data can be used to reveal anything about the impact of liming on the Hg content in pike. The register contains a broad set of data from 1456 lakes. The main results are as follows. Trend analyses indicate that the Hg content in 1-kg pike seems to increase with time. This is interesting since there has been a significant decrease in mercury emissions from Swedish industries during the last two decades. High Hg contents in 1-kg pike appear in a very characteristic pattern, linked to specific sources of Hg emission. The data indicate that old Swedish 'sins' are still causing a lot of problems. The factors governing the leakage of Hg from soils to water ought to be a very important topic for further studies. The Hg content in pike shows the highest correlation with the following parameters: Hg in surficial sediments, pH, distance from point source and water hardness, lake water alkalinity and conductivity, water retention time, size of drainage area and lake surface. A formula which provides the best possible degree of explanation (r2 = 0.78) has been derived. At present there are about 250 lakes 'blacklisted' in Sweden due to high Hg content in fish. Our data show that there are at least 9400 lakes that ought to be 'blacklisted' today. A successful liming operation will alter the chemical conditions in lakes and also decrease the Hg content in fish.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 15092669     DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90246-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of Hg bioaccumulation and transfer in aquatic food webs across multi-lake studies in the northeast US.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Richard S Stemberger; Neil C Kamman; Brandon M Mayes; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Changes in valued "Capacities" of soils and sediments as indicators of nonlinear and time-delayed environmental effects.

Authors:  W M Stigliani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Half a century of changing mercury levels in Swedish freshwater fish.

Authors:  Staffan Akerblom; Anders Bignert; Markus Meili; Lars Sonesten; Marcus Sundbom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Total mercury distribution in different tissues of six species of freshwater fish from the Kpong hydroelectric reservoir in Ghana.

Authors:  Alhassan Atta; Ray Bright Voegborlo; Eric Selorm Agorku
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Mercury contamination-what we have learned since Minamata.

Authors:  F M D'Itri
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Monitoring and assessment of mercury pollution in the vicinity of a chloralkali plant. IV. Bioconcentration of mercury in in situ aquatic and terrestrial plants at Ganjam, India.

Authors:  M Lenka; K K Panda; B B Panda
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Mercury accumulation in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) in a Florida lake.

Authors:  T R Lange; H E Royals; L L Connor
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Trace metal contamination in commercial fish and crustaceans collected from coastal area of Bangladesh and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Mohammad Raknuzzaman; Md Kawser Ahmed; Md Saiful Islam; Md Habibullah-Al-Mamun; Masahiro Tokumura; Makoto Sekine; Shigeki Masunaga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Mercury bioaccumulation in organisms from three Puerto Rican estuaries.

Authors:  J Burger; K Cooper; J Saliva; D Gochfeld; D Lipsky; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Rapid recovery following short-term acoustic disturbance in two fish species.

Authors:  Rick Bruintjes; Julia Purser; Kirsty A Everley; Stephanie Mangan; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.