Literature DB >> 15365392

Assessment of just-noticeable differences for refractive errors and spherical aberration using visual simulation.

Richard Legras1, Nicolas Chateau, W Neil Charman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the threshold levels of aberration change that a typical reference eye is able to detect.
METHODS: The method involved simulation of the foveal vision of a typical eye in polychromatic light through optics affected by different levels of the various chosen monochromatic aberrations. The reference eye had the following monochromatic wavefront characteristics based on the aberrations of a population of young adults: no spherical defocus, astigmatism -0.37D oriented at 0 degrees celsius, coma -0.17 D/mm oriented at 270 degrees celsius, and spherical aberration -0.12 D/mm. Average amounts of longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberration were assumed, and allowance was made for the Stiles-Crawford effect. The pupil diameter of the simulated eye was kept fixed at 6 mm. Three observers each compared, 100 times, a simulated image as seen through the standard reference eye with a variant "aberrated" image. The varying parameter was the value of a chosen additional aberration affecting the variant image in the reference eye. The test was repeated for varying amounts of spherical defocus, astigmatic defocus, and spherical aberration. For each of these aberrations and each observer, the discrimination probability as a function of the aberration level in the variant image was determined. The just-noticeable difference in aberration (JNDA) was derived from each discrimination curve as the difference between the aberrations corresponding to discrimination probabilities of 75% and 25%. The JNDA values obtained were expressed in the form of root mean square (RMS) wavefront error thresholds.
RESULTS: It was found that 0.04 microm of RMS aberration should be considered as the threshold of just-noticeable image change, in good agreement with the Maréchal criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that in normal viewing conditions (e.g., a 3-mm pupil size), optical corrections should be in the range of +/-0.15 D in sphere and cylinder from the target prescription if perceptible change in the quality of the perceived images is to be avoided. The design of conventional soft contact lenses of high negative power or positive power should aim to produce -0.07 D/mm of spherical aberration, with a tolerated interval between -0.15 to +0.01 D/mm for a 6-mm pupil size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15365392     DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000144751.11213.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  11 in total

1.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Raymond A Applegate; Yue Shi; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Comparison of higher order wavefront aberrations with four aberrometers.

Authors:  William H Cook; James McKelvie; Henry B Wallace; Stuti L Misra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Matching convolved images to optically blurred images on the retina.

Authors:  Sara Aissati; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Maria Vinas; Alberto de Castro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Population spherical aberration: associations with ametropia, age, corneal curvature, and image quality.

Authors:  Amanda C Kingston; Ian G Cox
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Monte Carlo simulation of expected outcomes with the AcrySof toric intraocular lens.

Authors:  Warren Hill; Richard Potvin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 9.  Clinical applications of wavefront refraction.

Authors:  Adrian S Bruce; Louis J Catania
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Biomechanics of Ophthalmic Crosslinking.

Authors:  Brecken J Blackburn; Andrew M Rollins; William J Dupps
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.