Literature DB >> 15365282

Why is self-monitoring reimbursed for blood glucose but not blood pressure?

Thomas G Pickering1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15365282      PMCID: PMC8109567          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

1.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: time for evidence of efficacy.

Authors:  L Kennedy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.

Authors:  A I Adler; I M Stratton; H A Neil; J S Yudkin; D R Matthews; C A Cull; A D Wright; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

3.  Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. American Society of Hypertension Ad Hoc Panel.

Authors:  T Pickering
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  E Boland; T Monsod; M Delucia; C A Brandt; S Fernando; W V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Home monitoring service improves mean arterial pressure in patients with essential hypertension. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Rogers; D Small; D A Buchan; C A Butch; C M Stewart; B E Krenzer; H L Husovsky
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effects of home telemonitoring and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: a pilot study.

Authors:  N T Artinian; O G Washington; T N Templin
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

Authors:  G Mancia; A Zanchetti; E Agabiti-Rosei; G Benemio; R De Cesaris; R Fogari; A Pessina; C Porcellati; A Rappelli; A Salvetti; B Trimarco; E Agebiti-Rosei; A Pessino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician.

Authors:  Svein Skeie; Geir Thue; Kari Nerhus; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Cardiovascular prognosis of "masked hypertension" detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Guillaume Bobrie; Gilles Chatellier; Nathalie Genes; Pierre Clerson; Laurent Vaur; Bernard Vaisse; Joël Menard; Jean-Michel Mallion
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Should doctors still measure blood pressure?

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.