Literature DB >> 15362400

The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects.

Thomas Jacobsen1, Katharina Buchta, Michael Köhler, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

The conceptual structure of the aesthetics of objects was investigated. To this end, associative namings for the word "aesthetics" were collected from 311 nonartist German college students in a timed verbal association task. 590 different adjectives were produced, depicting diversification of the concept. The adjective "beautiful" was given by more than 90% of the participants. The adjective "ugly" was the second most frequent naming, used by almost half of the students. All other namings were markedly less frequently produced. It is argues that the beautiful-ugly dimension represents the primary concept in the aesthetics of objects, so that performing aesthetic judgments of the beauty of objects comes naturally to individuals. In other words, the most prototypical aesthetic judgments are those of beauty. Furthermore, the majority of generated words had a positive valence as measured by an additional valence-rating study including 41 participants. This result contrasts with comparable studies of emotion terms, as such studies typically show a negativity bias. Frequency in general language use and valence of the adjectives did not account for the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362400     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1253-1260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  23 in total

1.  Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; C Urgesi; G Orgs; S M Aglioti; P Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Grounding evaluative concepts.

Authors:  Joerg Fingerhut; Jesse J Prinz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Artful terms: A study on aesthetic word usage for visual art versus film and music.

Authors:  M Dorothee Augustin; Claus-Christian Carbon; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-18

6.  Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality.

Authors:  Manuela Haertel; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-28

7.  Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Being moved: linguistic representation and conceptual structure.

Authors:  Milena Kuehnast; Valentin Wagner; Eugen Wassiliwizky; Thomas Jacobsen; Winfried Menninghaus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-03

9.  Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience of music.

Authors:  Elvira Brattico; Brigitte Bogert; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-01

10.  On the Role of Mentalizing Processes in Aesthetic Appreciation: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Susan Beudt; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.