PURPOSE: To assess the level of vascular enhancement of gadolinium-enhanced aortoiliac computed tomographic (CT) angiography with a 16-detector row CT scanner and to compare it with the results of previous similar studies that used four-detector row CT units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms were obtained in 10 consecutive patients with contraindication to iodinated contrast medium with use of a 16-detector row CT scanner. In the region of interest, attenuation measurements (in HU) were obtained from the proximal abdominal aorta to the common femoral arteries during unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and delayed acquisitions. The results were compared to those in the 15 consecutive patients who most recently had similar examinations performed on a four-detector row CT unit. Phantom studies with diluted gadolinium were conducted to compare attenuation between CT units. RESULTS: On four-detector row CT, throughout the scan length, mean enhancement values were 53.8 HU +/- 5.3 and 15.0 HU +/- 2.6 for gadolinium-enhanced and delayed series, respectively. For the 16-detector row CT unit, they were 76.1 HU +/- 3.4 and 21.3 HU +/- 1.3, respectively. As a result of a shorter scan time and a more optimal start time, the 16-detector row CT unit provided significantly greater and more consistent enhancement throughout the scan length compared with the four-detector row CT unit (P =.0106). Similar structures had significantly greater enhancement when 120 kV was applied instead of 140 kV (P =.0495) CONCLUSION: The 16-detector row CT scanner improved gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography results compared with the four-detector row CT unit.
PURPOSE: To assess the level of vascular enhancement of gadolinium-enhanced aortoiliac computed tomographic (CT) angiography with a 16-detector row CT scanner and to compare it with the results of previous similar studies that used four-detector row CT units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms were obtained in 10 consecutive patients with contraindication to iodinated contrast medium with use of a 16-detector row CT scanner. In the region of interest, attenuation measurements (in HU) were obtained from the proximal abdominal aorta to the common femoral arteries during unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and delayed acquisitions. The results were compared to those in the 15 consecutive patients who most recently had similar examinations performed on a four-detector row CT unit. Phantom studies with diluted gadolinium were conducted to compare attenuation between CT units. RESULTS: On four-detector row CT, throughout the scan length, mean enhancement values were 53.8 HU +/- 5.3 and 15.0 HU +/- 2.6 for gadolinium-enhanced and delayed series, respectively. For the 16-detector row CT unit, they were 76.1 HU +/- 3.4 and 21.3 HU +/- 1.3, respectively. As a result of a shorter scan time and a more optimal start time, the 16-detector row CT unit provided significantly greater and more consistent enhancement throughout the scan length compared with the four-detector row CT unit (P =.0106). Similar structures had significantly greater enhancement when 120 kV was applied instead of 140 kV (P =.0495) CONCLUSION: The 16-detector row CT scanner improved gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography results compared with the four-detector row CT unit.
Authors: Rolf Symons; Tyler E Cork; Manu N Lakshmanan; Robert Evers; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Kelly A Rice; Marvin L Thomas; Chia-Ying Liu; Steffen Kappler; Stefan Ulzheimer; Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke; Amir Pourmorteza Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 2.357