Literature DB >> 15358060

Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field.

Keith Kline1, Alex O Holcombe, David M Eagleman.   

Abstract

In stroboscopic conditions--such as motion pictures--rotating objects may appear to rotate in the reverse direction due to under-sampling (aliasing). A seemingly similar phenomenon occurs in constant sunlight, which has been taken as evidence that the visual system processes discrete "snapshots" of the outside world. But if snapshots are indeed taken of the visual field, then when a rotating drum appears to transiently reverse direction, its mirror image should always appeared to reverse direction simultaneously. Contrary to this hypothesis, we found that when observers watched a rotating drum and its mirror image, almost all illusory motion reversals occurred for only one image at a time. This result indicates that the motion reversal illusion cannot be explained by snapshots of the visual field. The same result is found when the two images are presented within one visual hemifield, further ruling out the possibility that discrete sampling of the visual field occurs separately in each hemisphere. The frequency distribution of illusory reversal durations approximates a gamma distribution, suggesting perceptual rivalry as a better explanation for illusory motion reversal. After adaptation of motion detectors coding for the correct direction, the activity of motion-sensitive neurons coding for motion in the reverse direction may intermittently become dominant and drive the perception of motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358060     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Leila Reddy; Florence Rémy; Nathalie Vayssière; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Leila Reddy; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal.

Authors:  Keith A Kline; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The Wagon Wheel Illusions and models of orientation selection.

Authors:  Patrick Martineau
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Pivotal role of hMT+ in long-range disambiguation of interhemispheric bistable surface motion.

Authors:  João Valente Duarte; Gabriel Nascimento Costa; Ricardo Martins; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Benedikt Zoefel; Barkin Ilhan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Intraocular injection of muscimol induces illusory motion reversal in goldfish.

Authors:  Sang-Yoon Lee; Chang-Sub Jung
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.016

8.  Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Ongoing EEG Phase as a Trial-by-Trial Predictor of Perceptual and Attentional Variability.

Authors:  R Vanrullen; N A Busch; J Drewes; Julien Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-09

10.  The psychophysics of brain rhythms.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen; Julien Dubois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.