Literature DB >> 15357779

Costs of on-demand and prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden.

K Steen Carlsson1, S Höjgård, A Lindgren, S Lethagen, S Schulman, A Glomstein, L Tengborn, E Berntorp, B Lindgren.   

Abstract

The expected annual cost (in the year 2000 prices) for a 30-year-old patient with average individual and treatment characteristics for on-demand EUR 51,832 (95% CI: 44,324-59,341) and for prophylaxis EUR 146,118 (95% CI: 129,965-162,271), was obtained from panel-data analysis of an 11-year retrospective panel of 156 patients with severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden. Costs included haemophilia-related treatment costs within the health-care sector (factor concentrate, doctors' visits, diagnostic procedures, hospitalisation, invasive procedures, etc.) and cost for haemophilia-related resource use in other sectors (lost production, use of special equipment, adaptation of workplace and domicile, etc). Although costs of lost production, reconstructive surgery and hospitalisation were higher for on-demand, they did not balance out the higher costs of factor-concentrate consumption in prophylaxis. The cut-off risk of premature death, where on-demand and prophylaxis would have been equally costly, was 3.7 percentage units higher for on-demand than for prophylaxis. Such a great risk difference has not been reported elsewhere to our knowledge. Estimated cost-elasticities indicated that annual costs of prophylaxis would increase by approximately the same proportion as a potential increase in the price of factor concentrate and decrease less than proportionately with a reduction in prescribed dose kg(-1). For on-demand, the annual costs would increase by approximately the same proportion as an increase in the prescribed dose kg(-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15357779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00952.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  9 in total

1.  Prophylaxis for adults with haemophilia: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Kathelijn Fischer
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Present and future challenges in the treatment of haemophilia: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Romano Arcieri; Angelo C Molinari; Stefania Farace; Giuseppe Mazza; Alberto Garnero; Gabriele Calizzani; Paola Giordano; Emily Oliovecchio; Lorenzo Mantovani; Lamberto Manzoli; Paul Giangrande
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Intermediate-dose versus high-dose prophylaxis for severe hemophilia: comparing outcome and costs since the 1970s.

Authors:  Kathelijn Fischer; Katarina Steen Carlsson; Pia Petrini; Margareta Holmström; Rolf Ljung; H Marijke van den Berg; Erik Berntorp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Humanistic and economic aspects of haemophilia treatment in Bulgaria. Comparison between two therapeutic approaches: prophylactic vs. on-demand treatment.

Authors:  Guenka Petrova; Konstantin Tachkov; Svetla Georgieva; Maria Dimitrova
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.632

5.  Direct-to-consumer Marketing to People with Hemophilia.

Authors:  Philip Kucab; Katelyn Dow Stepanyan; Adriane Fugh-Berman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia.

Authors:  Kapil Saxena
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2013-05-16

7.  Prevalence, incidence, and factor concentrate usage trends of hemophiliacs in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tsu-Chiang Tu; Wen-Shyong Liou; Tsui-Yun Chou; Tsung-Kun Lin; Chuan-Fang Lee; Jye-Daa Chen; Thau-Ming Cham; Mei-Ing Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  The Utilization of Rehabilitation in Patients with Hemophilia A in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Yao-Hsu Yang; Chia-Hao Chang; Chih-Cheng Chen; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of extended half-life versus conventional factor product on hemophilia caregiver burden.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Victoria E Powell; Jun Su; Jie Zhang; Adi Eldar-Lissai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.