BACKGROUND: Posts frequently are used to retain buildups. The authors examined the effects of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. METHODS: The authors embedded 26 root-treated mandibular molars in endodontic cubes and sectioned them perpendicularly to their long axis at 1.8-millimeter intervals. They placed Gates-Glidden drills nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 sequentially to 5 mm short of working length in the distal canals. After using each drill size, the authors measured the dentin thickness from light microscopic images of the tooth slices. RESULTS: The authors analyzed data to detect changes resulting from canal instrumentation. They performed statistical analysis by partitioning the variability in a nested analysis of variance. Strip perforations occurred with a no. 4 Gates-Glidden drill 7.3 percent of the time and more frequently with larger drills. After endodontic treatment alone, the canal wall on the furcal side was less than 1 mm thick 82 percent of the time and less than 0.5 mm thick 17.5 percent of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Dentin thickness correlates inversely to post space diameter. A no. 4 Gates-Glidden drill caused strip perforations in 7.3 percent of the canals studied, and therefore the authors recommend that Gates-Glidden drills larger than a no. 3 not be used in these roots. After endodontic treatment, the furcation-side dentin thickness was less than 1 mm in 82 percent of the teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Post space preparation in mandibular molars carries significant risk of perforation. Post space in such teeth should be limited to the endodontically prepared canal.
BACKGROUND: Posts frequently are used to retain buildups. The authors examined the effects of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. METHODS: The authors embedded 26 root-treated mandibular molars in endodontic cubes and sectioned them perpendicularly to their long axis at 1.8-millimeter intervals. They placed Gates-Glidden drills nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 sequentially to 5 mm short of working length in the distal canals. After using each drill size, the authors measured the dentin thickness from light microscopic images of the tooth slices. RESULTS: The authors analyzed data to detect changes resulting from canal instrumentation. They performed statistical analysis by partitioning the variability in a nested analysis of variance. Strip perforations occurred with a no. 4 Gates-Glidden drill 7.3 percent of the time and more frequently with larger drills. After endodontic treatment alone, the canal wall on the furcal side was less than 1 mm thick 82 percent of the time and less than 0.5 mm thick 17.5 percent of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Dentin thickness correlates inversely to post space diameter. A no. 4 Gates-Glidden drill caused strip perforations in 7.3 percent of the canals studied, and therefore the authors recommend that Gates-Glidden drills larger than a no. 3 not be used in these roots. After endodontic treatment, the furcation-side dentin thickness was less than 1 mm in 82 percent of the teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Post space preparation in mandibular molars carries significant risk of perforation. Post space in such teeth should be limited to the endodontically prepared canal.