Literature DB >> 15353195

Potential of biomimetic surfaces to promote in vitro osteoblast-like cell differentiation.

S Hattar1, A Asselin, D Greenspan, M Oboeuf, A Berdal, J-M Sautier.   

Abstract

Bioactive glasses, osteoproductive materials, have received considerable attention as bone graft substitutes in the treatment of bony defects. More recent strategies for achieving a predictable periodontal regeneration include the use of enamel matrix proteins, due to their role in the formation of bone tissue. The aim of our study is to examine the effects of these materials on the proliferation and differentiation of the mouse preosteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1. Cells were cultured up to 28 days in contact with three types of granules: Bioglass 45S5 granules (BG), 45S5 granules coated with enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) (BG/EMD), and a less reactive glass used as a control (60S). Phase contrast microscopic observations have shown that all substrates supported the growth of osteoblastic cells. Zones of differentiation were observed at an earlier stage in cultures of BG and BG/EMD. TEM observations revealed ultrastructural features very close to what is observed in vivo during intramembranous ossification with a direct bone apposition on the bioactive glasses. Total protein production was higher in the cultures with BG and BG/EMD. Northern Blot analysis revealed a stimulation of the transcription factor Cbfa1/Runx2 at day 13 in cultures of BG when compared to the two other cultures. Bone sialoprotein (early marker of differentiation) and osteocalcin (marker of late-stage differentiation) expression was increased in cultures with BG and BG/EMD when compared to 60S. Taken together, our findings indicate that Bioglass alone or combined with Emdogain, have the ability to support the growth of osteoblast-like cells in vitro and to promote osteoblast differentiation by stimulating the expression of major phenotypic markers. In addition, we noticed that the bioactive granules coated with Emdogain revealed significantly higher protein production than the bioactive granules alone at day 20.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15353195     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  11 in total

Review 1.  The use of micro- and nanospheres as functional components for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Huanan Wang; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; Yubao Li; John A Jansen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Effects of SiO2 substitution on wettability of laser deposited Ca-P biocoating on Ti-6Al-4V.

Authors:  Yuling Yang; Sameer R Paital; Narendra B Dahotre
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Differentiation of preosteoblasts using a delivery system with BMPs and bioactive glass microspheres.

Authors:  E Bergeron; M E Marquis; I Chrétien; N Faucheux
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Recent advances and future perspectives of sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses: a review.

Authors:  Kalim Deshmukh; Tomáš Kovářík; Tomáš Křenek; Denitsa Docheva; Theresia Stich; Josef Pola
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions.

Authors:  V G Varanasi; E Saiz; P M Loomer; B Ancheta; N Uritani; S P Ho; A P Tomsia; S J Marshall; G W Marshall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  On the biocompatibility of a novel Ti-based amorphous composite: structural characterization and in-vitro osteoblasts response.

Authors:  H Lefaix; A Asselin; P Vermaut; J-M Sautier; A Berdal; R Portier; F Prima
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate.

Authors:  Ann Leu; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  The effect of an enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) combined with bone ceramic on bone formation in mandibular defects: a histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study in the canine.

Authors:  Reza Birang; Mohammad Shah Abouei; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Peyaman Zia; Ahmad Soolari
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

9.  Extracellular Matrix Components Regulate Bone Sialoprotein Expression in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Florian Keller; Roman Bruch; Franziska Clauder; Mathias Hafner; Rüdiger Rudolf
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Enamel matrix protein derivatives: role in periodontal regeneration.

Authors:  Vandana J Rathva
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.