Literature DB >> 15352050

Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening of cervical neoplasia: results from a multicenter study in India.

Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan1, Ramdas Chatterji, Surendra S Shastri, Ramani S Wesley, Partha Basu, Cédric Mahe, Richard Muwonge, Daniel Seigneurin, Thara Somanathan, Chinmoy Roy, Rohini Kelkar, Roshini Chinoy, Ketayun Dinshaw, Ranajit Mandal, Geethanjali Amin, Smriti Goswami, Smarajit Pal, Sharmila Patil, Namrata Dhakad, Lucien Frappart, Bernard Fontaniere.   

Abstract

The knowledge that cervical neoplasia are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has led to the evaluation of its role in screening. We evaluated the accuracy of HPV testing by Hybrid capture II (HC II) method in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN 2 and 3) lesions in 4 cross-sectional studies with common protocol and questionnaire in 3 different locations (Kolkata, Mumbai and Trivandrum) in India. These studies involved 18,085 women aged 25-65 years. The reference standard for final diagnosis was a combination of colposcopy/biopsy. All women were investigated with colposcopy and 3,116 received directed biopsy. The sensitivity of HPV testing for detecting CIN 2-3 lesions varied from 45.7% to 80.9% across the study sites; the specificity varied from 91.7% to 94.6% and the positive predictive value from 6.7% to 13.7%. Retesting of 298 randomly chosen denatured samples in France revealed an agreement rate of 85.9% and a kappa-value of 0.72. Although HPV testing seems to be a promising approach for cervical cancer prevention, a large range in sensitivity was observed in our study, possibly due to variations in the quality of specimen collection and reference standards. A higher sensitivity was associated with the center performing the test well. Further developments in terms of more reproducible, less expensive and less sophisticated testing are essential to make the test feasible and effective in low-resource settings. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15352050     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  30 in total

1.  "My husband says this: If you are alive, you can be someone…": Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in India.

Authors:  Timothy-Paul H Kung; Janna R Gordon; Asha Abdullahi; Apurva Barve; Vipul Chaudhari; Jayendrakumar K Kosambiya; Ambuj Kumar; Sukesha Gamit; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Assessment of follow-up, and the completeness and accuracy of cancer case ascertainment in three areas of India.

Authors:  Aleyamma Mathew; Carrie R Daniel; Leah M Ferrucci; Tulika Seth; Susan S Devesa; Preethi S George; Hemali Shetty; Niveditha Devasenapathy; Susan Yurgalevitch; Tanuja Rastogi; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Prakash C Gupta; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  SNIPER: a novel assay for human papillomavirus testing among women in Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Suzanne E Belinson; Na Wulan; Ruizhen Li; Wei Zhang; Xuan Rong; Yasha Zhu; Ruifang Wu; Jerome L Belinson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Oncogenic HPV among HIV infected female population in West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Kamalesh Sarkar; Reshmi Pal; Baishali Bal; Bibhuti Saha; Subhasish Bhattacharya; Sharmila Sengupta; Partha Pratim Mazumdar; Shekhar Chakraborti
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Systems analysis of real-world obstacles to successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries.

Authors:  Eric J Suba; Sean K Murphy; Amber D Donnelly; Lisa M Furia; My Linh D Huynh; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Advancing cervical cancer prevention in India: implementation science priorities.

Authors:  Suneeta Krishnan; Emily Madsen; Deborah Porterfield; Beena Varghese
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-11-11

7.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

Review 8.  Worldwide impact of the human papillomavirus vaccine.

Authors:  Amy A Hakim; Tri A Dinh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-04-23

9.  The performance of human papillomavirus high-risk DNA testing in the screening and diagnostic settings.

Authors:  Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Michael E Scheurer; Karen Adler-Storthz; J L Benedet; J Robert Beck; Michele Follen; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Human papillomavirus genotyping by multiplex pyrosequencing in cervical cancer patients from India.

Authors:  Cheryl M Travasso; Mona Anand; Mansi Samarth; Aditi Deshpande; Chandan Kumar-Sinha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.