Literature DB >> 15351906

Specificity of choline metabolites for in vivo diagnosis of breast cancer using 1H MRS at 1.5 T.

Peter Stanwell1, Laurence Gluch, David Clark, Boguslaw Tomanek, Luke Baker, Bruno Giuffrè, Cynthia Lean, Peter Malycha, Carolyn Mountford.   

Abstract

The purpose was to determine if in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) at 1.5 T can accurately provide the correct pathology of breast disease. Forty-three asymptomatic volunteers including three lactating mothers were examined and compared with 21 breast cancer patients. Examinations were undertaken at 1.5 T using a purpose-built transmit-receive single breast coil. Single voxel spectroscopy was undertaken using echo times of 135 and 350 ms. The broad composite resonance at 3.2 ppm, which includes contributions from choline, phosphocholine (PC), glycerophosphocholine (GPC), myo-inositol and taurine, was found not to be a unique marker for malignancy providing a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 80.0 and 86.0%, respectively. This was due to three of the asymptomatic volunteers and all of the lactating mothers also generating the broad composite resonance at 3.2 ppm. Optimised post-acquisitional processing of the spectra resolved a resonance at 3.22 ppm, consistent with PC, in patients with cancer. In contrast the spectra recorded for three false-positive volunteers, and the three lactating mothers had a resonance centred at 3.28 ppm (possibly taurine, myo-inositol or GPC). This improved the specificity of the test to 100%. Careful referencing of the spectra and post-acquisitional processing intended to optimise spectral resolution of in vivo MR proton spectra from human breast tissue resolves the composite choline resonance. This allows the distinction of patients with malignant disease from volunteers with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 100%. Therefore, resolution of the composite choline resonance into its constituent components improves the specificity of the in vivo (1)H MRS method, but does not overcome the problem of 20% false-negatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351906     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2475-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  T K Tran; D B Vigneron; N Sailasuta; J Tropp; P Le Roux; J Kurhanewicz; S Nelson; R Hurd
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E O Aboagye; Z M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Volume-localized two-dimensional correlated magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Thomas; N Binesh; K Yue; N DeBruhl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Computerized consensus diagnosis: a classification strategy for the robust analysis of MR spectra. I. Application to 1H spectra of thyroid neoplasms.

Authors:  R L Somorjai; A E Nikulin; N Pizzi; D Jackson; G Scarth; B Dolenko; H Gordon; P Russell; C L Lean; L Delbridge
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; W Hänicke; D Matthaei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Characterization of neoplastic and normal human breast tissues with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  K A Kvistad; I J Bakken; I S Gribbestad; B Ehrnholm; S Lundgren; H E Fjøsne; O Haraldseth
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Fine-needle biopsy specimens of benign breast lesions distinguished from invasive cancer ex vivo with proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  W B Mackinnon; P A Barry; P L Malycha; D J Gillett; P Russell; C L Lean; S T Doran; B H Barraclough; M Bilous; C E Mountford
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  1H chemical shift imaging reveals loss of brain tumor choline signal after administration of Gd-contrast.

Authors:  P E Sijens; M J van den Bent; P J Nowak; P van Dijk; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  In vivo 1H MRS of normal breast and breast tumors using a dedicated double breast coil.

Authors:  I S Gribbestad; T E Singstad; G Nilsen; H E Fjøsne; T Engan; O A Haugen; P A Rinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Choline and choline esters in human and rat milk and in infant formulas.

Authors:  M Q Holmes-McNary; W L Cheng; M H Mar; S Fussell; S H Zeisel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  35 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Waka Mizukoshi; Eito Kozawa; Kaiji Inoue; Naoko Saito; Naoko Nishi; Toshiaki Saeki; Fumiko Kimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.

Authors:  Kun Sun; Weimin Chai; Caixia Fu; Ying Zhan; Kunwei Shen; Xianfu Luo; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR Spectroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael T Nelson; Lenore I Everson; Michael Garwood; Tim Emory; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  Semin Breast Dis       Date:  2008-06-01

5.  In vivo monitoring response to chemotherapy of human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma xenografts in SCID mice by 1H and 31P MRS.

Authors:  Ming Q Huang; David S Nelson; Stephen Pickup; Hui Qiao; E James Delikatny; Harish Poptani; Jerry D Glickson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ihab S Haddadin; Adeka McIntosh; Sina Meisamy; Curt Corum; Angela L Styczynski Snyder; Nathaniel J Powell; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  MR imaging and proton spectroscopy of the breast: how to select the images useful to convey the diagnostic message.

Authors:  A Fausto; A Magaldi; B Babaei Paskeh; L Menicagli; E N Lupo; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Quadrature transmit coil for breast imaging at 7 tesla using forced current excitation for improved homogeneity.

Authors:  Mary Preston McDougall; Sergey Cheshkov; Joseph Rispoli; Craig Malloy; Ivan Dimitrov; Steven M Wright
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Biochemical characterization of breast tumors by in vivo and in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

Authors:  Uma Sharma; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2009-01-17

Review 10.  Clinical applications of metabolomics in oncology: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Spratlin; Natalie J Serkova; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.