Literature DB >> 15351612

Misattributed paternity in a living related donor: to disclose or not to disclose?

Douglas W Soderdahl1, Danny Rabah, Thomas McCune, John Colonna, Roland French, Edwin Robey, Michael D Fabrizio.   

Abstract

Many ethical considerations surround living kidney donation, some of which are not anticipated. We present a case in which misattributed paternity was inadvertently discovered during the workup of a father and son and present arguments for and against disclosure of this information. We recommend that transplant programs advise patients participating in living organ donor programs that misattributed paternity might be discovered during routine preoperative testing and that protocols for dealing with complex ethical issues be in place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351612     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Should physicians tell the truth without taking social complications into account? A striking case.

Authors:  Ercan Avci
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03

Review 2.  Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.

Authors:  Mark A Bellis; Karen Hughes; Sara Hughes; John R Ashton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  An old problem in a new age: Revisiting the clinical dilemma of misattributed paternity.

Authors:  Laura Hercher; Leila Jamal
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.