Literature DB >> 15350733

A universal microarray for detection of SARS coronavirus.

Wei-Hong Long1, Hua-Sheng Xiao, Xiao-Mei Gu, Qing-Hua Zhang, Hong-Jun Yang, Guo-Ping Zhao, Jian-Hua Liu.   

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). There are many point mutations among SARS-CoV genome sequences. Previous studies suggested that the mutations are correlated closely with the SARS epidemic. It was found that the bases of six nucleotide positions (nt9404, nt9479, nt19838, nt21721, nt22222 and nt27827) with high-mutation rate have an important relationship with the SARS epidemic. For viral detection as well as genotyping, a universal microarray system was developed that combines RT-PCR and ligase detection reaction (LDR). The Zip Codes attached covalently to a slide remain constant and their complementary Zip Codes (cZip Codes) can be used for tagging target sequence, making the microarrays universal. The discriminating oligonucleotides contain on the 5' end "cZip Codes" that are used to direct LDR product to specific Zip Codes attached covalently to a slide. Since Zip Codes have no homology to either the target sequence or to other sequences in the genomes of both human host and SARS-CoV, there was no false signal due to mismatch hybridizations. 20 samples assayed with the universal microarray were confirmed by DNA sequencing, demonstrating that this microarray system is a promising diagnostic tool for detection and genotyping of the SARS-CoV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15350733      PMCID: PMC7112900          DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a disease that spread widely in the world including mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Canada and America last year, is caused by a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV (Drosten et al., 2003, Li et al., 2003). The disease is transmitted by droplets and direct contact (Booth et al., 2003, Li et al., 2003). Because of the rate of mortality in patients, it is very important to identify SARS-CoV quickly and accurately. Two strategies are used commonly to identify this virus: immunoassay and nucleic acid-based assay. After 156 SARS patients were tested with ELISA, it was found that the positive rates of IgG and IgM were 75.6 and 41.7%, respectively (Wang et al., 2003a, Wang et al., 2003b). The methods of immunofluroscent assay (IFA) also have high percent of false negative. Nucleic acid detection has higher specificity for diagnosis (Zhuang et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003a, Wang et al., 2003b). However, SARS-CoV is characterized by the rapid mutation (Li et al., 2003). To date, many mutations including point mutations and few short deletions or insertions were detected in different infected individuals (Chen et al., 2003, He et al., 2004). Considerable researches suggested that variations in viral genomes caused viral transmission from animal to man (Tsui et al., 2003, Ruan et al., 2003, Guan et al., 2003). The genotypes at six positions (nt9404, nt9479, nt19838, nt21721, nt22222 and nt27827) with high-mutation rate were identified closely with the three phases of the SARS epidemic (Table 1 ) – C, C, A, A, C, C (early phase); C, T/C, G, A, C, C (middle phase); T, T, A, G, T, T (late phase). Because the mutations were closely identified with SARS-CoV emergence, the study of the mutations can provide helpful informations for other studies, such as the SARS vaccine, the SARS drug design and the infectious mechanisms of the SARS-CoV.
Table 1

The six mutation sites of 40 SARS-CoV genome sequences and two SARS-like coronavirus genome sequences

NameCityID9404947919838217212222227827
SARS-CoV SZ3ShenzhenAY304486CCAACC
SARS-CoV SZ16ShenzhenAY304488CCAACC
SARS-CoV GZ02GuangzhouAY390556CCAACC
SARS-CoV ZS-AZhongshanAY394997CCAACC
SARS-CoV ZS-BZhongshanAY394996CCAACC
SARS-CoV ZS-CZhongshanAY395003CCAACC
SARS-CoV GD01GuangdongAY278489CCGACC
SARS-CoV BJ01BeijingAY278488CTGACC
SARS-CoV BJ02BeijingAY278487CTGACC
SARS-CoV BJ03BeijingAY278490CTGACC
SARS-CoV CUHK-AG01Hong KongAY345986TTAGTT
SARS-CoV CUHK-AG02Hong KongAY345987TTAGTT
SARS-CoV CUHK-AG03Hong KongAY345988TTAGTT
SARS-CoV CUHK Su10Hong KongAY282752TTAGTT
SARS-CoV FRAItalyAY310120TTAGTT
SARS-CoV ASMilan ItalyAY427439TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Frankfurt 1GermanyAY291315TTAGTT
SARS-CoV HKU-39849Hong KongAY278491TTAGTT
SARS-CoV HSR 1ItalyAY323977TTAGTT
SARS-CoV PUMC01BeijingAY350750TTAGTT
SARS-CoV PUMC02BeijingAY357075TTAGTT
SARS-CoV PUMC03BeijingAY357076TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sin2500SingaporeAY283794TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sin2677SingaporeAY283795TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sin2679SingaporeAY283796TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sin2748SingaporeAY283797TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sin2774SingaporeAY283798TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sino1-11BeijingAY485277TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Sino3-11BeijingAY485278TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Taiwan TC1TaiwanAY338174TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Taiwan TC2TaiwanAY338175TTAGTT
SARS-CoV Taiwan TC3TaiwanAY348314TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TW1TaiwanAY291451TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TWCTaiwanAY321118TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TWC2TaiwanAY362698TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TWC3TaiwanAY362699TTAGTT
SARS-CoV UrbaniUSAAY278741TTAGTT
SARS-CoV ZMY 1GuangdongAY351680TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TWKTaiwanAP006559TTAGTT
SARS-CoV WHUWuhanAY394850TTAGTT
SARS-CoV ZJ01ZhejiangAY297028TTAGTT
SARS-CoV TOR2aTorontoAY274119TTAGTT

SARS-CoV TOR2 is used as a reference.

The six mutation sites of 40 SARS-CoV genome sequences and two SARS-like coronavirus genome sequences SARS-CoV TOR2 is used as a reference. Recently, a universal microarray has been reported for the detection of human SNPs (Holton, 2001), small insertions and deletions in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (Favis et al., 2000) and different bacterial genomes (Busti et al., 2002). Only 1 fmol of the purified PCR products can be detected by this method (Bellis. et al., 2002). A microarray system with the similar method for the SARS-CoV detection and genotyping is reported here (Fig. 1 ). In contrast with RT-PCR and the cDNA microarray used to detect SARS-CoV, this universal microarray cannot only detect the SARS-CoV but also identify the genotypes of six mutated bases related to the different phases of the SARS epidemic. This microarray system is more economical and labor-saving than the SARS-CoV resequencing microarray for complete sequence analysis. Actually, the partial sequences around important variations can provide enough information for viral detection as well as for genotyping.
Fig. 1

The schematic of the universal microarray-mediated by LDR. (A) The genotype of every mutation base can be detected by a set of oligonucleotides including a discriminating oligonucleotide and a labeled oligonucleotide. The discriminating oligonucleotide contains a cZip Code at 5′ end and a hydroxy group at 3′ end. The labeled oligonucleotide was phosphorylated at 5′ end and is affixed a Cy3 to 3′ end. The two sequences at the junction must be matched. (B) The spotting sequences consist of a Zip Code at the 5′ end and the (dA)15-NH2 H2hat 3′ end; the discriminating oligonucleotide includes cZip Code at the 5′ end and the hybridization sequence at 3′ end.

The schematic of the universal microarray-mediated by LDR. (A) The genotype of every mutation base can be detected by a set of oligonucleotides including a discriminating oligonucleotide and a labeled oligonucleotide. The discriminating oligonucleotide contains a cZip Code at 5′ end and a hydroxy group at 3′ end. The labeled oligonucleotide was phosphorylated at 5′ end and is affixed a Cy3 to 3′ end. The two sequences at the junction must be matched. (B) The spotting sequences consist of a Zip Code at the 5′ end and the (dA)15-NH2 H2hat 3′ end; the discriminating oligonucleotide includes cZip Code at the 5′ end and the hybridization sequence at 3′ end.

Materials and methods

SARS-CoV genomic cDNAs

Viral genomic cDNAs and the primers in this study were obtained from the Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (Shanghai, China, http://www.chgc.sh.cn). All specimens (including serum, stool, oropharyngeal swabs, nasal pharyngeal aspirates or aotupsy lung tissues) were collected from the patients of SARS cases at the Guangdong Center for Disease Control and Prevention (GDCDCP) and at local hospitals in China last year. RNA was extracted with the QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (QIAgen, CA, USA) or TRIZOL Reagent (GIBCOBRL, MD, USA). The double-strand cDNA was synthesized with the SuperScript cDNA system (Invitrogen, CA, USA) or RNA PCR Kit (AMV) Ver 2.1 (Takara, Dalian, China).

Choose of target bases

Based on previous studies (He et al., 2004, Chen et al., 2003), the software ClusterX was used to align 42 coronavirus complete genome sequences (including 40 SARS-CoV genome sequences and two SARS-like coronavirus genome sequences) (Table 1). SARS-CoV TOR2 genome sequence was used as a reference in the analysis. It was found that the mutated bases at six positions (nt9404, nt9479, nt19838, nt21721, nt22222 and nt27827) are related to the SARS epidemic. These mutated bases have high-mutation rates and one base (nt19838) is non-sense mutation as well as a contrastive detection site. The two sites, nt9404 and nt9479, lie in the coded sequences of Nsp1, a protein with the most number of amino acid changes (Table 2 ). Two bases (nt21721 and nt22222) were found in the coding sequences of Spike and a base (nt27827) in the coding sequence of SARS8a may play an important role in the evolution of SARS-CoV (He et al., 2004). Considering the character of the LDR reaction, about 28 bases were chosen at 3′ end of the discriminating oligonucleotide and about 22 bases at 5′ end of the labeled oligonucleotide as the hybridization zone (Table 3 ). The hybridization zones were checked and ensured that they were found only in SARS-CoV genome sequences.
Table 2

The changes of the codons and the amino acids related to the six mutated bases in early phase, middle phase and late phase of the SARS epidemic

Early phase
Middle phase
Late phase
CodonaAmino acidCodonaAmino acidCodonaAmino acid
Sites
 9404GTT/GCTVal/AlaGCTAlaGTTVal
 9479GCAAlaGCAAlaGCA/GTAAla/Val
 19838GTAValGTGValGTAVal
 21721GACAspGACAspGGCGly
 22222ACTThrACTThrATTIle
 27827CGCArgCGCArgTGCCys

The bold and italic bases are the mutation bases.

Table 3

The discriminating oligonucleotides and the labeled oligonucleotides

SitesDiscriminating oligonucleotide (5′ → 3′)Labeled oligonucleotide (5′ → 3′)
1TGGCGAGAGTGTCTCGTCGATCATCCTACTACTTTATGAAATTCAGACGTGCp-TTTTGGTGAGTACAACCATGTTGTT-Cy3
ATCTTGCGCGGCAGCTCGTCGACCGCTACTACTTTATGAAATTCAGACGTGT
AAAGCGGGCGGCGATCGCGAATGTCCTACTACTTTATGAAATTCAGACGTGA



2AGATTGGGATGCGGTCGCGATACCGGATGTCTTTCACTATACTCTGTCTGGTp-ACCAGCTTACAGCTTTCTGCCGG-Cy3
GAGGATCTGTAGCGCCTCTTCGAGCGATGTCTTTCACTATACTCTGTCTGGC
CGAACTCGAAGCCGAGCTGGCGGTGTTTGATGTCTTTCACTATACTCTGTA



3GATCGGCCGGTGAAGCGAAAGGTTCAAAAGAGAAGCCCCAGCACATGTAp-TCTACAATAGGTGTCTGCACAATGACT-Cy3
GATGGTGATCCCGCGCGTGCCGAAAAAAAGAGAAGCCCCAGCACATGTG
GGATTGCACCGTCAGCACCACCGAGAAAAGAGAAGCCCCAGCACATGTT



4TCCCAGGACGGCGCTGGCACGTTGAGTTTCATACTATTAATCATACGTTTGGp-CAACCCTGTCATACCTTTTAAGGA-Cy3
CGGCGTCCACGTCGAGTTCCTTCGCGTTTCATACTATTAATCATACGTTTGA
TGTGCGCCCGAGATCGGTATCCCCGGTTTCATACTATTAATCATACGTTTGT



5ATCGCATCGTGATGGCGTAAGCTCCAGCCTTTTCACCTGCTCAAGACATp-TTGGGGCACGTCAGCTGCAGC-Cy3
TTCGGGGAAACTCCGCACCGCCACGAGCCTTTTCACCTGCTCAAGACAC
TAGGTTTGGCCAGTGCGTTGGATCGAGCCTTTTCACCTGCTCAAGACAA



6TCGACAACCCGGTTGGAGGATTCAGTTGTATTTCTCTATGCAGTTGCATATp-GCACTGTAGTACAGCGCTGTGC-Cy3
CCAAAAGCTTTACGCCAGCGCCGAATTGTATTTCTCTATGCAGTTGCATAC
CCGTACCCTTCCGCTGGAGATTTACTTGTATTTCTCTATGCAGTTGCATAAA



7The hybridization control cZip CodeGGGTATCCGTTCGGTGTTGCGTAGT-Cy3

The italic sequences are the cZip Codes and the bold and italic bases are the mutated bases. Tm value of the discriminating oligonucleotides is about 65 °C and Tm value of the labeled oligonucleotides is about 55 °C.

The changes of the codons and the amino acids related to the six mutated bases in early phase, middle phase and late phase of the SARS epidemic The bold and italic bases are the mutation bases. The discriminating oligonucleotides and the labeled oligonucleotides The italic sequences are the cZip Codes and the bold and italic bases are the mutated bases. Tm value of the discriminating oligonucleotides is about 65 °C and Tm value of the labeled oligonucleotides is about 55 °C.

Zip Codes assignment

Twenty Zip Codes were assigned as described by Favis et al., 2000, Favis et al., 2000. One of the Zip Codes was used to confirm the immobility of the spotted samples by hybridizing with the cZip Code labeled with Cy3 at 5′ end. Another Zip Code was used to measure the efficiency of the hybridization. The others are described in Table 4 . Each detection site has three Zip Codes: positive Zip Code, negative Zip Code and contrastive Zip Code. They are attached by (dA)15-NH2 at 3′ end (Table 3).
Table 4

The spotting oligonucleotides

Number of sequencesSpotting sequences (5′ → 3′)
Site 1
 Positive sequenceGATGATCGACGAGACACTCTCGCCA (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceCGGTCGACGAGCTGCCGCGCAAGAT (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceGACATTCGCGATCGCCGCCCGCTTT (A)15-NH2



Site 2
 Positive sequenceCGGTATCGCGACCGCATCCCAATCT (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceGCTCGAAGAGGCGCTACAGATCCTC (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceCACCGCCAGCTCGGCTTCGAGTTCG (A)15-NH2



Site 3
 Positive sequenceGAACCTTTCGCTTCACCGGCCGATC (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceTTTCGGCACGCGCGGGATCACCATC (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceCTCGGTGGTGCTGACGGTGCAATCC (A)15-NH2



Site 4
 Positive sequenceTCAACGTGCCAGCGCCGTCCTGGGA (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceGCGAAGGAACTCGACGTGGACGCCG (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceCGGGGATACCGATCTCGGGCGCACA (A)15-NH2



Site 5
 Positive sequenceGGAGCTTACGCCATCACGATGCGAT (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceCGTGGCGGTGCGGAGTTTCCCCGAA (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceCGATCCAACGCACTGGCCAAACCTA (A)15-NH2



Site 6
 Positive sequenceCTGAATCCTCCAACCGGGTTGTCGA (A)15-NH2
 Negative sequenceTTCGGCGCTGGCGTAAAGCTTTTGG (A)15-NH2
 Contrastive sequenceGTAAATCTCCAGCGGAAGGGTACGG (A)15-NH2



Spotting control sequenceCy3-CCGGCTTTGAACTGCTCACCGATCT (A)15-NH2



Hybridization controlACTACGCAACACCGAACGGATACCC (A)15-NH2
The spotting oligonucleotides

Amplification of the SARS-CoV cDNA sample

PCRs were performed in a DNA Engine Dyad cycler (M.J. Research, MA, USA). The sequences of the primers are shown in Table 5 . The reaction was performed in a 50 μl volume containing 400 nM each primer, 200 μM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1× buffer, 2 U of HotStar DNA polymerase (QIAGEN, CA, USA) and 10 ng of SARS-CoV genome cDNA. Prior to amplification, DNA was denatured for 15 min at 95 °C, which also activated HotStar DNA polymerase. The amplification consists of 95 °C for 15 min (initial denature), 16 touch-down cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 66 °C for 30 s (decrease 0.5 °C each cycle), 72 °C for 1 min and 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 40 s, 72 °C for 1 min. After the cycles, an extension step (10 min at 72 °C) was followed.
Table 5

Primers for SARS-CoV PCR and correspondent of viaral genomes

No.Upstream primer (5′ → 3′)Downstream primer (5′ → 3′)Regions
1CCCTGTAGTAGCTGCTATCATTGAAGGTGAGCCAAGAATGAAACnt8748-9574
2GCAAACAAGTAGTGTCGGATATTTCAGGCAACTGTTGAATAATnt19336-20124
3CTTAACAGAGCATTTGAGTTCAGCAACATACTTCATCTATGAGGGGnt22364-21585
4TAGCACACACTTTGCTTTTGCAGTATTATTGGGTAAACCTTGGnt27449-28270

PCR product 1 including the detection sites: 9404 and 9479; PCR product 2 including one detection site: 19838; PCR product 3 including two detection sites: 21721 and 22222; PCR product 4 including one detection site: 27827.

Primers for SARS-CoV PCR and correspondent of viaral genomes PCR product 1 including the detection sites: 9404 and 9479; PCR product 2 including one detection site: 19838; PCR product 3 including two detection sites: 21721 and 22222; PCR product 4 including one detection site: 27827. After amplification, the PCR products were purified by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, CA, USA), eluted in 30 μl autoclaved water and quantified by spectrophotometer. The products of PCR can be qualified by the electrophoresis graph of the PCR products (Fig. 2 ).
Fig. 2

The electrophoresis graph of the PCR products. The PCR products in the picture: PCR1, PCR2, PCR3 and PCR4 is relative to the numbers (Table 3): 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

The electrophoresis graph of the PCR products. The PCR products in the picture: PCR1, PCR2, PCR3 and PCR4 is relative to the numbers (Table 3): 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

Preparation of microarray

The spotting oligonucleotides dissolved in 1% N-methyl morpholine solution were placed into the 384-well microtiter plate. They were arrayed onto the isothioyanate slides as arrangement with machine microarrayer (GENE Machines, CA, USA). Hybridization was carried out by the HB-1000 HybChamber (GENE Machines, CA, USA). The scan was finished by ScanArray 4000C (Parkard, MA, USA). Spotted slides were incubated at 37 °C, 95% humidity in a light-tighted chamber with the same conditions for 8 h as described by Busti et al., 2002, Busti et al., 2002. 10 mM ammonia (twice, 15 min each) was used to block free thiocyanate groups. Extensive washing the slides with TE buffer (four times, 5 min each) was followed to eliminate un-bound oligonucleotides. Dried slides were stored in a dessicator at 4 °C in dark ready for use.

Ligation reaction

The ligation reaction was carried out in a final volume of 40 μl containing 2.5 pmol of each discriminating oligonucleotide, 2.5 pmol of each labeled oligonucleotide, 100 fmol of each purified PCR products, 1× ligation buffer, 1 U Taq DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). The reaction mixtures were performed as the following: 95 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 4 min (40 cycles). All the procedures were carried out in a DNA Engine Dyad cycler (M.J. Research, MA, USA).

Microarray hybridization and detection

The products of ligation were mixed with 12 μl solution containing 6× SSC, 0.1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA and 50 pmol hybridization control cZip Code (Table 3). The mixtures were heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Then the solution was quickly chilled on ice and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 3 min to remove any undissolved particles. The supernants were added onto the microarray. Then a cover slip (large enough to cover the entire array surface) was carefully placed on the microaaray to avoid any bubble captured in. The slides were incubated in a sealed hybridization chamber saturated with PBS (pH 7.3) at 37 °C for 60 min. The hybridized slides were washed at room temperature with 6× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 3 min, 4× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 3 min, 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 3 min and 2× SSC for 3 min and spinned at 1500 rpm for 5 min to remove any residual drops on the slides. The slides were scaned by a ScanArray 4000c laser scanning system (Parkard Biochip Technologies, MA, USA) with laser for Cy3 dye (λ ex 543 nm/λ ex 570 nm) at 10 μm resolution.

Results and discussion

This microarray has 108 spots arranged in nine rows (Fig. 3 (A)). 20 samples were assayed with the microarray, yielding the sequence information that was completely confirmed by DNA sequencing (data not shown). A result is shown in Fig. 3(B). However, cDNA samples obtained from health persons did not produce any signals (data not shown). Referring the design (Fig. 3(A)), the discriminating oligonucleotides (Table 3) and the spotting oligonucleotides (Table 4), we can get the genotypes from the detection sketch (Fig. 3B). They are: C (nt9404), T (nt9479), G (nt19838), A (nt21721), C (nt22222) and C (nt27827). It is the characteristic genotypes of the middle phase of the SARS epidemic. If there are two kinds of genotypes, this microarray can also detect them, such as the heterozygous sample.
Fig. 3

SARS universal microarray. (A) Spotting design of the universal microarray. The color is added artificially in order to distinguish the different sites. (B) Detection results of a sample.

SARS universal microarray. (A) Spotting design of the universal microarray. The color is added artificially in order to distinguish the different sites. (B) Detection results of a sample. The wild genotypes of six bases are C, C, A, A, C and C. The mutated genotypes are C, C/T, G, A, C and C in middle phase; T, T, A, G, T and T in late phase. The bases (nt9404, nt9479, nt21721, nt22222 and nt27827) are stable after the mutation in the evolution of SARS-CoV. This suggests that the change of these bases may play an important role in the evolution of this virus and the corresponding proteins related to these mutated bases may be more important for viral infection. Besides the identification of the SARS-CoV, this universal microarray can provide the related genotypes in the different phases of epidemic. These relative genotypes comprised of six bases can help the epidemiologists to know that the detection samples belong to which phase of the epidemic. The aim is to develop an efficient and economical microarray system to detect the SARS-CoV and identify the genotypes of the six mutated bases. We designed the spotting control and the hybridization control. The spotting control was used to optimize the conditions of the immobility of the spotting samples. The hybridization control is useful to find out the range of the better hybridization conditions with less time. In order to confirm the SARS-CoV samples, PCRs were applied with 16-pair SARS-specific primers. SARS-CoV-specific primers, HotStar DNA polymerase and touch-down PCRs were used in the amplification of the samples, which can guarantee the fidelity of the SARS-CoV cDNA amplification. There were still the PCR products with the “mutant” due to the generation of the single base “mutant” during PCRs. LDR reaction with strict matched in the hybridization zone can almostly eliminate the influence of the “mutant”. The reasons may be the following facts. If not the detection base, the “mutant” becomes noneffective after LDR reaction. At the time, the amount of the SARS-CoV templates was far more than the amount of the templates with the “mutant”, which was the main reason to eliminate the influence of the PCR “mutant”. As result of these, this microarray system can decrease the influence of the PCR “mutants” significantly. This microarray is the ideal tool for the detection of the virus with high-mutation rate, such as SARS-CoV. This method can also be applied to the study of other point mutation viruses.
  13 in total

1.  [Detection of the anti-SARS-coronavirus specific antibody levels in 156 SARS patients].

Authors:  Hai-Bao Wang; Jing-Han Liu; Xi-Lin Ouyang; Yang Yu; Shu-Xuan Ma; Xi-Jin Li; Liu-Cai Lu; Ya-Ping Tian; Hong-Ying Liu; Hong-Min Xu; Wei Yao
Journal:  Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2003-10

2.  Molecular evolution of the SARS coronavirus during the course of the SARS epidemic in China.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Coronavirus genomic-sequence variations and the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen K W Tsui; Stephen S C Chim; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area.

Authors:  Christopher M Booth; Larissa M Matukas; George A Tomlinson; Anita R Rachlis; David B Rose; Hy A Dwosh; Sharon L Walmsley; Tony Mazzulli; Monica Avendano; Peter Derkach; Issa E Ephtimios; Ian Kitai; Barbara D Mederski; Steven B Shadowitz; Wayne L Gold; Laura A Hawryluck; Elizabeth Rea; Jordan S Chenkin; David W Cescon; Susan M Poutanen; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  [Initial analysis of complete genome sequences of SARS coronavirus].

Authors:  Yun-Jia Chen; Ge Gao; Yi-Ming Bao; Rodrigo Lopez; Jian-Min Wu; Tao Cai; Zhi-Qiang Ye; Xiao-Cheng Gu; Jing-Chu Luo
Journal:  Yi Chuan Xue Bao       Date:  2003-06

7.  [Analysis of false-positive associated with antibody tests for SARS-CoV in SLE patients].

Authors:  Yun Shan Wang; Hong Shen; Shan Hui Sun; Li Hua Jiang; Yang Liu; Zhi Wei Zhu; Dong Jie Xiao; Ping Huang; Bo Yang; Xi Yan Du; Yuan Chao Zhang
Journal:  Shi Yan Sheng Wu Xue Bao       Date:  2003-08

8.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus genotype and its characterization.

Authors:  Lanjuan Li; Zhigang Wang; Yiyu Lu; Qiyu Bao; Suhong Chen; Nanping Wu; Suyun Cheng; Jingqing Weng; Yanjun Zhang; Juying Yan; Lingling Mei; Xiaomeng Wang; Hanping Zhu; Yingpu Yu; Minli Zhang; Minhong Li; Jun Yao; Qunying Lu; Pingping Yao; Xiaochen Bo; Jianer Wo; Shengqi Wang; Songnian Hu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Bacterial discrimination by means of a universal array approach mediated by LDR (ligase detection reaction).

Authors:  Elena Busti; Roberta Bordoni; Bianca Castiglioni; Paolo Monciardini; Margherita Sosio; Stefano Donadio; Clarissa Consolandi; Luigi Rossi Bernardi; Cristina Battaglia; Gianluca De Bellis
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection.

Authors:  Yi Jun Ruan; Chia Lin Wei; Ai Ling Ee; Vinsensius B Vega; Herve Thoreau; Se Thoe Yun Su; Jer-Ming Chia; Patrick Ng; Kuo Ping Chiu; Landri Lim; Tao Zhang; Chan Kwai Peng; Ean Oon Lynette Lin; Ng Mah Lee; Sin Leo Yee; Lisa F P Ng; Ren Ee Chee; Lawrence W Stanton; Philip M Long; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  19 in total

1.  Combining multiplex reverse transcription-PCR and a diagnostic microarray to detect and differentiate enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16.

Authors:  Tsan-Chi Chen; Guang-Wu Chen; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Shin-Ru Shih; Yiu-Kay Lai; Jyh-Lyh Juang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A Brief Review on Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease of Livestock: Conventional to Molecular Tools.

Authors:  Neeta Longjam; Rajib Deb; A K Sarmah; Tilling Tayo; V B Awachat; V K Saxena
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2011-07-06

3.  Microarray-based identification of antigenic variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus: a bioinformatics quality assessment.

Authors:  Verónica Martín; Celia Perales; David Abia; Angel R Ortíz; Esteban Domingo; Carlos Briones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  The influence of locked nucleic acid residues on the thermodynamic properties of 2'-O-methyl RNA/RNA heteroduplexes.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kierzek; Anna Ciesielska; Karol Pasternak; David H Mathews; Douglas H Turner; Ryszard Kierzek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Nearest neighbor parameters for Watson-Crick complementary heteroduplexes formed between 2'-O-methyl RNA and RNA oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kierzek; David H Mathews; Anna Ciesielska; Douglas H Turner; Ryszard Kierzek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Advances in ligase chain reaction and ligation-based amplifications for genotyping assays: Detection and applications.

Authors:  Abdullah A Gibriel; Ola Adel
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.657

7.  DNA single-base mismatch study with an electrochemical enzymatic genosensor.

Authors:  Patricia Abad-Valle; M Teresa Fernández-Abedul; Agustín Costa-García
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  ORMA: a tool for identification of species-specific variations in 16S rRNA gene and oligonucleotides design.

Authors:  Marco Severgnini; Paola Cremonesi; Clarissa Consolandi; Giada Caredda; Gianluca De Bellis; Bianca Castiglioni
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Chapter 13 Recent Advances and Future Needs in Environmental Virology.

Authors:  Mark Wong; Irene Xagoraraki; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Perspect Med Virol       Date:  2007-09-06

10.  Comprehensive detection and identification of seven animal coronaviruses and human respiratory coronavirus 229E with a microarray hybridization assay.

Authors:  Qin Chen; Jian Li; Zhirui Deng; Wei Xiong; Quan Wang; Yong-Qiang Hu
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.