Literature DB >> 15350241

Psychological essentialism in children.

Susan A Gelman1.   

Abstract

Psychological essentialism is the idea that certain categories, such as "lion" or "female", have an underlying reality that cannot be observed directly. Where does this idea come from? This article reviews recent evidence suggesting that psychological essentialism is an early cognitive bias. Young children look beyond the obvious in many converging ways: when learning words, generalizing knowledge to new category members, reasoning about the insides of things, contemplating the role of nature versus nurture, and constructing causal explanations. These findings argue against the standard view of children as concrete thinkers, instead claiming that children have an early tendency to search for hidden, non-obvious features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15350241     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  32 in total

1.  Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: a donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Mary Wakefield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Psychiatric disorders: natural kinds made by the world or practical kinds made by us?

Authors:  Peter Zachar
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Conceptual influences on induction: A case for a late onset.

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky; Wei Sophia Deng; Anna V Fisher; Heidi Kloos
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Conceptual knowledge increases infants' memory capacity.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Generic language in scientific communication.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Maureen A Callanan; Graciela Solis; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The scope of formal explanation.

Authors:  Sandeep Prasada
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

7.  Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.

Authors:  Matthew E Lancaster; Ryan Shelhamer; Donald Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

8.  Essentialism in the absence of language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Webb Phillips; Maya Shankar; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-07

Review 9.  The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Tara M Mandalaywala
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-03-08

10.  Generics designate kinds but not always essences.

Authors:  Alexander Noyes; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.