Literature DB >> 15349732

[Comparison of high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging and PET-CT. First experiences with a 32-channel MRI system].

G P Schmidt1, A Baur-Melnyk, R Tiling, K Hahn, M F Reiser, S O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy in the detection and staging of various malignant tumors with high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging with whole-body dual-modality PET-CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preliminary results of an interim analysis from a prospective, blinded study are presented, in which 20 patients (mean age 59 years, range 27-77 years) with different oncological diseases underwent whole-body dual modality FDG-PET-CT screening for tumor search or staging in case of confirmed or suspected metastatic disease. All patients also underwent whole-body MRI imaging with the use of parallel imaging (iPAT). High-resolution coronal T1w- and STIR-sequences of 5 body levels with 512 x 512 matrix, axial fast T2w imaging of lung and abdomen (HASTE), contrast-enhanced dynamic and static T1w-sequences of liver, brain, abdomen, and pelvis were performed. Using a 32-channel whole-body MRI scanner (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens Medical Solutions) with a total field of view of 205 cm and free table movement, all patients could be covered from head to toe within one examination. With this technique, high spatial resolution and acceptable scanning times could be obtained. Two experienced radiologists read the MRI-scans, one radiologist and one nuclear scientist read PET-CT scans, each in consensus in a clinical setting. Delineation of the primary tumor (T-stage) or recurrent tumor, pathologic lymph node involvement, as well as degree and localization of metastatic disease, was assessed using PET-CT as standard of reference.
RESULTS: Metastases from gastrointestinal tumor (25%) and breast cancer (25%), genitourinary tumor (15%) and malignant melanoma (15%) were detected. In 4/20 patients the primary tumor was identified, 2/20 patients showed recurrent tumor. Of 140 malignant lesions detected by PET-CT, 124 lesions were detected with MRI, resulting in a sensitivity of 89% at a specificity of 86%. In malignant lymph node detection, sensitivity of MRI was 83% and specificity 85%.
CONCLUSION: Whole-body MRI is a promising technique in the detection of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Sensitivity in the assessment of lymph node metastases seems to be limited. With the use of parallel imaging (iPAT), dedicated high-resolution whole-body MRI is possible within acceptable scanning times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15349732     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-004-1102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  28 in total

1.  Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in melanoma patients.

Authors:  G S Mijnhout; O S Hoekstra; M W van Tulder; G J Teule; W L Devillé
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  R Manfredi; T Pirronti; L Bonomo; P Marano
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients.

Authors:  Medhat M Osman; Christian Cohade; Yuji Nakamoto; Laura T Marshall; Jeff P Leal; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques.

Authors:  R C Semelka; S Worawattanakul; N L Kelekis; G John; J T Woosley; M Graham; W G Cance
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Engelhard; H P Hollenbach; K Wohlfart; E von Imhoff; F A Fellner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  "Anatometabolic" tumor imaging: fusion of FDG PET with CT or MRI to localize foci of increased activity.

Authors:  R L Wahl; L E Quint; R D Cieslak; A M Aisen; R A Koeppe; C R Meyer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Didier Lardinois; Walter Weder; Thomas F Hany; Ehab M Kamel; Stephan Korom; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Hans C Steinert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET.

Authors:  Henry W D Yeung; Ravinder K Grewal; Mithat Gonen; Heiko Schöder; Steven M Larson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology.

Authors:  Gerald Antoch; Florian M Vogt; Lutz S Freudenberg; Fridun Nazaradeh; Susanne C Goehde; Jörg Barkhausen; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Whole body MRI--diagnostic strategy of the future?].

Authors:  M Goyen; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging?

Authors:  Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  [Whole-body MRI and PET/CT in tumor diagnosis].

Authors:  G P Schmidt; R Schmid; K Hahn; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Comparison between whole-body MRI and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET or PET/CT in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mario Ciliberto; Fabio Maggi; Giorgio Treglia; Federico Padovano; Lucio Calandriello; Alessandro Giordano; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Perirenal Edema as a potential hint towards primary hypertension-Preliminary findings in MRI breast cancer staging.

Authors:  Clemens G Kaiser; Pascal Baltzer; Anna K Kaiser; Julia Knaudt; Thomas Henzler; Werner A Kaiser; Matthias Dietzel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.