Literature DB >> 15348119

Effect of convergence angle and luting agent on the fracture strength of In ceram crowns.

L Correr Sobrinho1, S Consani, J C Knowles.   

Abstract

This study compared the fracture strength of In ceram crown shapes fabricated with either 8 or 16 degrees total occlusal convergence; and attached with either a commercial zinc phosphate cement or a glass ionomer cement. Thirty crown shapes (8 mm diameter and 8.5 mm high) were fabricated for each preparation design on a brass master die with approximately the same dimensions as a premolar. In ceram crown shapes were luted on to the die using zinc phosphate or glass ionomer. The crown shapes were fractured in a testing machine (Instron) using a steel ball, 4 mm in diameter, that contacted the occlusal surface and the resulting data were statistically analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test. The results indicate that there is no statistical difference in the fracture strength values between preparations with 8 degrees total convergence compared with 16 degrees using the same cement. However, crown shapes luted with zinc phosphate on preparations with 8 and 16 degrees total occlusal convergence were significantly stronger than those luted using glass ionomer cements (p<0.05). Copyright 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15348119     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008905210614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  17 in total

1.  The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: 2.

Authors:  M G Doyle; C A Munoz; C J Goodacre; L D Friedlander; B K Moore
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: Part 1.

Authors:  L D Friedlander; C A Munoz; C J Goodacre; M G Doyle; B K Moore
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  The cast glass-ceramic restoration.

Authors:  K A Malament; D G Grossman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  The strength of cemented alumina core and magnesia core crowns.

Authors:  S O Hondrom
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Adaption of luting cement to enamel, dentin and restorative material.

Authors:  G Oilo
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Relationship between compressive strength and cervical shaping of the all-ceramic Cerestore crown.

Authors:  G Sjögren; M Bergman
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1987

7.  The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns.

Authors:  G Bernal; R M Jones; D T Brown; C A Munoz; C J Goodacre
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Resistance to fracture of metal ceramic and all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  D Castellani; T Baccetti; A Giovannoni; U D Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  The effect of convergence angle on retention and resistance form.

Authors:  W W Dodge; R M Weed; R J Baez; R N Buchanan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.677

10.  The effect of crown length on the fracture resistance of posterior porcelain and glass-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  S S Scherrer; W G de Rijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the wet and dry fatigue properties of all ceramic crowns.

Authors:  L C Sobrinho; R H Glover; J C Knowles; M J Cattell
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.