Literature DB >> 15348354

Osteoblast viability and detachment following exposure to ultrasound in vitro.

H Sura1, R M Shelton, A D Walmsley.   

Abstract

Ultrasound has been used in dentistry for over 40 years and has recently been proposed for cutting bone. The purpose of this study was to establish the effects of ultrasonic instruments on osteoblasts. A 25 kHz magnetostrictive ultrasound generator and a TFI-1 tip (Dentsply, UK) were used as the ultrasound generating instruments. Primary osteoblast cultures were established from the parietal bones of two-day-old Albino Wistar rats grown on tissue culture (TC) petri dishes (Corning, UK) in alphaMEM (Sigma, UK). Once confluent, the osteoblasts were harvested using 0.05% trypsin in 0.02% EDTA then 1.7 x 10(5) cells in 2.5 ml of alphaMEM were either re-seeded immediately onto TC dishes and allowed to adhere for 24 h or kept in suspension before application of ultrasound with different tip displacements prior to re-seeding the cells. Osteoblast viability was assessed using 0.4% Trypan Blue following the initial dose of ultrasound then periodically over a 20 h period for both adherent and suspension osteoblasts. This study demonstrated that ultrasound caused osteoblast detachment and loss of viability in vitro, both when adherent to a substrate or in suspension. Loss of osteoblast viability was related to the maximum displacement of the ultrasonic tip and continued throughout the 20 h period observed for osteoblasts adherent to TC dishes. Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15348354     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012873402275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  12 in total

1.  Investigations into the use of an ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 1: Forces applied by clinicians.

Authors:  B S Khambay; A D Walmsley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Investigations into the use of an ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 2: Cutting ability.

Authors:  B S Khambay; A D Walmsley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of the cutting effect on bone of an ultrasonic cutting device and rotary burs.

Authors:  T A MCFALL; G M YAMANE; G W BURNETT
Journal:  J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv       Date:  1961-05

4.  Surgical instrument design for the accurate cutting of bone for implant fixation.

Authors:  R J Minns
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1992

Review 5.  Bone cutting.

Authors:  J Y Giraud; S Villemin; R Darmana; J P Cahuzac; A Autefage; J P Morucci
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1991-02

6.  Preliminary results and analysis of a new set of sonic instruments for root-end cavity preparation.

Authors:  T Von Arx; B Kurt; B Ilgenstein; N Hardt
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  Observations of carbon dioxide laser and bone bur in the osteotomy of the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  I A Small; T P Osborn; T Fuller; M Hussain; S Kobernick
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1979-03

8.  Cutting ability of an ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation instrument.

Authors:  M Waplington; P J Lumley; A D Walmsley; L Blunt
Journal:  Endod Dent Traumatol       Date:  1995-08

9.  Clinical applications of ultrasonic instrumentation in the surgical removal of bone.

Authors:  J E Horton; T M Tarpley; J R Jacoway
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1981-03

10.  [Water jet cutting for bones and bone cement--parameter study of possibilities and limits of a new method].

Authors:  M Honl; R Rentzsch; F Lampe; V Müller; O Dierk; E Hille; H Louis; M Morlock
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.