Literature DB >> 15348196

Material properties of various cements for use with vertebroplasty.

L E Jasper1, H Deramond, J M Mathis, S M Belkoff.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to measure the material properties of various cements prepared per manufacturers' recommendations and of cements modified according to compositions developed by clinicians with experience performing vertebroplasty. Cement was prepared, cast to form cylindrical specimens, and tested in compression. The optical density of specimens from the various cement preparations was measured. Batches of Simplex P and Cranioplastic cement were also prepared with increased concentrations of BaSO4 (20% and 30%; and 10%, 20% and 30%, respectively) to evaluate the effect of additional BaSO4. Compressive modulus values for polymethylmethacrylate cements ranged from 2-2.7 GPa; some differences were significant (p<0.05). Compared with polymethylmethacrylate cements, Orthocomp exhibited almost twice the compressive modulus and 2-3 times the strength values. Increasing the BaSO4 concentration in Simplex P and Cranioplastic significantly (p<0.05) affected their material properties; however, it is unknown if these changes in material properties are clinically important. Optical density increased as a function of concentration of the opacifying agent added. The current study provides clinicians with information on changes in the material properties of bone cements when the compositions are altered in a manner consistent with the practice of vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15348196     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013673830184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  15 in total

1.  The effect of monomer-to-powder ratio on the material properties of cranioplastic.

Authors:  L E Jasper; H Deramond; J M Mathis; S M Belkoff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; M Maroney; D C Fenton; J M Mathis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Improvement of mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement by fiber reinforcement.

Authors:  S Saha; S Pal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment of steroid-induced osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  J M Mathis; M Petri; N Naff
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-01

Review 6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art.

Authors:  A Cotten; N Boutry; B Cortet; R Assaker; X Demondion; D Leblond; P Chastanet; B Duquesnoy; H Deramond
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  A characterization of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  S S Haas; G M Brauer; G Dickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.

Authors:  J D Barr; M S Barr; T J Lemley; R M McCann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Effect of hand mixing tobramycin on the fatigue strength of Simplex P.

Authors:  J P Davies; W H Harris
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-11

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  22 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.

Authors:  John M Mathis; A Orlando Ortiz; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Bone cements: review of their physiochemical and biochemical properties in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew J Provenzano; Kieran P J Murphy; Lee H Riley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Effect of cement volume and placement on mechanical-property restoration resulting from vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sean Molloy; Lee H Riley; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Analysis of rheological properties of bone cements.

Authors:  M K D Nicholas; M G J Waters; K M Holford; G Adusei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with kyphoplasty.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; H Deramond; L E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

9.  Subsequent fractures post-vertebral augmentation: analysis of a prospective randomized trial in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  L Gilula; M Persenaire
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais; D Ronca
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.