Literature DB >> 10458269

An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

S M Belkoff1, M Maroney, D C Fenton, J M Mathis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies (VBs) subjected to compression fractures and subsequently treated with bipedicular injections of various polymethylmethacrylate cements. Ten spines were harvested from nonembalmed female cadavers (age 68.6 +/- 13.7 years) and evaluated for bone mineral density using the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method (t-score = -2.3 +/- 2.4). The 50 VBs (L1-L5) were disarticulated, compressed in a materials testing machine to determine initial strength and stiffness, and then assigned to one of six groups. Two of these groups (n = 8, n = 9) concerned experimental cements, the results of which are not reported here. The 33 vertebral bodies in the remaining four groups were left untreated or were repaired using a transpedicular injection of one of three commercially available polymethylmethacrylate cements. These four groups were: a) no treatment (no cement, n = 8); b) Simplex P (n = 9); c) Cranioplastic (n = 8); and d) Osteobond (n = 8). The VBs were then compressed again according to the initial protocol, and posttreatment strength and stiffness were measured. Results suggested that bipedicular injection of Simplex P and Osteobond restored VB stiffness to initial values, whereas VBs injected with Cranioplastic were significantly less stiff than in their initial state. VBs injected with cement (regardless of type) were significantly stronger than they were initially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458269     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00128-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  28 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  J M Mathis; J D Barr; S M Belkoff; M S Barr; M E Jensen; H Deramond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.

Authors:  John M Mathis; A Orlando Ortiz; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Bone cements: review of their physiochemical and biochemical properties in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew J Provenzano; Kieran P J Murphy; Lee H Riley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Material properties of various cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  L E Jasper; H Deramond; J M Mathis; S M Belkoff
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Strength of antimicrobial bone cement decreases with increased poragen fraction.

Authors:  Matt Nugent; Alex McLaren; Brent Vernon; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Percutaneous vertebroplasty (pv): indications, contraindications, and technique].

Authors:  R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; A Wallnöfer; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Paul Heini; Markus Windolf; Erich Schneider
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis N Gaitanis; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael N Tzermiadianos; Dritan S Pasku; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression].

Authors:  R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; B B Ertl-Wagner; A Wallnöfer; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.