Literature DB >> 153471

Prenatal genetic diagnosis in 3000 amniocenteses.

M S Golbus, W D Loughman, C J Epstein, G Halbasch, J D Stephens, B D Hall.   

Abstract

We analyzed 3000 consecutive amniocenteses for prenatal diagnosis to assess the frequency of abnormalities, safety of the procedure, technical and interpretive difficulties and overall diagnostic accuracy. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 2.4 per cent of the 2404 pregnancies tested because of advanced maternal age (greater than or equal to 35 years), in 1.2 per cent of 240 monitored because of prior trisomy 21 and in 9.1 per cent of 55 examined for other cytogenetic indications. Mosaicism was detected in 0.4 per cent, and unexpected translocations in 0.4 per cent. Amniotic fluid was obtained on the first attempt in 99.3 per cent of the last 1000 cases, and cultures established from 99.7 per cent of patients attending our clinic. The fluid was discolored in 1.2 per cent of patients, a quarter of whom had missed abortions. The rate of spontaneous abortion after amniocentesis was 1.5 per cent. There were 14 diagnostic errors, six serious enough to affect the outcome of pregnancy. The karyotyping error rate was 0.07 per cent. We conclude that prenatal diagnosis is safe, highly reliable and extremely accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 153471     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197901253000402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal diagnosis: the medical genetics perspective. Ethics and Public Policy Committee, Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Eugenic abortion: an ethical critique.

Authors:  M N Beck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P Philippe
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Application of flow karyotyping in prenatal detection of chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  J W Gray; B Trask; G van den Engh; A Silva; C Lozes; S Grell; S Schonberg; L C Yu; M S Golbus
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Audit of amniocentesis from a district general hospital: is it worth it?

Authors:  J J Wiener; A Farrow; S C Farrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-12

7.  SCREENING PROCEDURES IN PEDIATRICS.

Authors:  Ts Raghu Raman; R K Gupta
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

8.  First trimester prenatal diagnosis: earlier is not necessarily better.

Authors:  J A Boss
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction with amplification of small tandem repeats and S100B in chromosome 21.

Authors:  Young Ho Yang; Mi Suk Nam; Eun Suk Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Miscarriage rates after dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a case control study.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Eddy Ryan; Andrea Weghofer; Sonia Blanco-Mejia; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.