PURPOSE: Experimental phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions with five different digital and one conventional screen-film mammography system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiographs were obtained at various configurations of the phantom with one conventional screen-film system (Mammomat 3000 N) (Siemens), five digital systems (high resolution computed radiography system [Fuji/Siemens], one a-Si detector [GE Medical Systems], two a-Se detectors [Siemens; Hologic / Lorad] and one CCD detector [Fischer Imaging]), applying the same exposure parameters. The Wisconsin Mammographic Random Phantom, Model 152 A, was used. Five investigators with different experience in mammography (3 months to more than 4 years) evaluated the 18 randomly selected radiographs. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of simulated breast lesions for conventional screen-film mammography (84.9 %), high resolution computed radiography (86.7 %) and digital mammography with an a-Si detector (89.8 %). Highly significantly better results (p < 0.001) were found with the two a-Se systems (97.3 %) and the CCD system (100 %). CONCLUSION: Conventional screen-film mammography can be replaced by high resolution computed radiography and digital mammography with a-Si-, a-Se- and CCD-detectors. This has to be confirmed in further clinical studies.
PURPOSE: Experimental phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions with five different digital and one conventional screen-film mammography system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiographs were obtained at various configurations of the phantom with one conventional screen-film system (Mammomat 3000 N) (Siemens), five digital systems (high resolution computed radiography system [Fuji/Siemens], one a-Si detector [GE Medical Systems], two a-Se detectors [Siemens; Hologic / Lorad] and one CCD detector [Fischer Imaging]), applying the same exposure parameters. The Wisconsin Mammographic Random Phantom, Model 152 A, was used. Five investigators with different experience in mammography (3 months to more than 4 years) evaluated the 18 randomly selected radiographs. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of simulated breast lesions for conventional screen-film mammography (84.9 %), high resolution computed radiography (86.7 %) and digital mammography with an a-Si detector (89.8 %). Highly significantly better results (p < 0.001) were found with the two a-Se systems (97.3 %) and the CCD system (100 %). CONCLUSION: Conventional screen-film mammography can be replaced by high resolution computed radiography and digital mammography with a-Si-, a-Se- and CCD-detectors. This has to be confirmed in further clinical studies.
Authors: R Schulz-Wendtland; M Bani; M P Lux; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; P A Fasching; B Adamietz; M Meier-Meitinger Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Kathrin Barbara Krug; Hartmut Stützer; Peter Frommolt; Julia Boecker; Henning Bovenschulte; Volker Sendler; Klaus Lackner Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2010-10-17