Literature DB >> 15346050

Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femoral replacement.

Christian M Ogilvie1, Jay S Wunder, Peter C Ferguson, Anthony M Griffin, Robert S Bell.   

Abstract

Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement is a well-accepted method for treatment of primary bone tumors; however the functional results of treatment are not well documented. To evaluate functional outcomes, we recorded the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1987 and 1993 scores in 29 patients, and also recorded Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores alone in four more patients treated with endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement. The mean followup was 3 years. Twelve patients had a total hip endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement, and 21 had a bipolar hip endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement. In nine patients, the greater trochanter was attached to the femoral prosthesis. Sixteen patients had an abductor soft tissue repair, and in eight patients, no abductor repair was possible. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1987 score was 23.2 +/- 4.1 points of 35 points. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1993 score was 67.7 +/- 12.0%. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score mean was 76.2 +/- 16.2 points of 100 points. Functional scores did not differ significantly between abductor repair types. There was a trend toward less disability in patients with abductor soft tissue repair compared with patients with no abductor repair. Functional results were similar in patients receiving bipolar and total hip replacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346050     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136840.67864.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.

Authors:  Teresa Calabró; Rupert Van Rooyen; Ilaria Piraino; Elisa Pala; Giulia Trovarelli; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-04

2.  Total hip replacement for proximal femoral tumours: our midterm results.

Authors:  V A Sokolovski; V P Voloshin; M D Aliev; V S Zubikov; S A Saravanan; D V Martynenko; D V Nisichenko; K N Strelnikov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter S Rose; Peter C Ferguson; Franklin H Sim; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Novel Cemented Technique for Trochanteric Fixation and Reconstruction of the Abductor Mechanism in Proximal and Total Femoral Arthroplasty: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Brian T Muffly; Kyle T Boden; Cale A Jacobs; Patrick W O'Donnell; Stephen T Duncan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-08-09

5.  Proximal femoral replacements for metastatic bone disease: financial implications for sarcoma units.

Authors:  Robert U Ashford; Sammy A Hanna; Derek H Park; Rob C Pollock; John A Skinner; Timothy W R Briggs; Stephen R Cannon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections?

Authors:  Rodolfo Capanna; Guido Scoccianti; Filippo Frenos; Antonio Vilardi; Giovanni Beltrami; Domenico Andrea Campanacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Trochanter/calcar preserving reconstruction in tumors involving the femoral head and neck.

Authors:  Hwan Seong Cho; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-18

8.  Outcomes of major musculoskeletal oncological reconstructions using prolene mesh-a retrospective analysis from a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Love Kapoor; Roshan Banjara; Ashish Ragase; Abdul Majeed; Venkatesan Sampath Kumar; Shah Alam Khan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-04

9.  The use of massive endoprostheses for the treatment of bone metastases.

Authors:  D H Park; P K Jaiswal; W Al-Hakim; W J S Aston; R C Pollock; J A Skinner; S R Cannon; T W R Briggs
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2007

10.  No consensus on implant choice for oligometastatic disease of the femoral head and neck.

Authors:  Taylor J Reif; Patrick K Strotman; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Benjamin J Miller; Lukas M Nystrom
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.