Literature DB >> 15346023

Spring-mediated cranial reshaping for craniosynostosis.

Lisa R David1, Patrick Proffer, William J Hurst, Stephen Glazier, Louis C Argenta.   

Abstract

The evolution of modern craniofacial surgery has come full circle from the early strip craniectomies to the complete calvarial remodeling and now back to attempts at minimally invasive surgical interventions. The goal of the craniofacial surgeon has always been the correction of form and function with minimization of associated morbidity and mortality. Particularly problematic has been the ability to maintain the anatomical correction beyond the result seen on the operating room table secondary to changes with growth. The ability to improve the clinical result in a growing and developing child has been the impetus for dynamic treatment modalities. Dr Claes Lauritzen's pioneering work in this area has been particularly successful using internal springs to correct craniofacial deformities. The purpose of this study is to assess this treatment modality clinically in terms of safety and efficacy and to develop a methodology for the spring formation that would be easily reproducible. This is an institutional review board-approved prospective study of 15 children (11 male, 4 female) with non-syndromic sagittal suture synostosis. All patients were treated with a sagittal strip craniectomy and placement of 2 omega-shaped stainless steel springs at a mean age of 3.9 months. Patients were followed clinically and with cephalograms; after reossification of the intervening bone, the springs were removed at a mean age of 8.2 months. The mean force applied at initial placement of the springs was 6.9 N, and the mean spring deflection at formation was 6.87 cm. All patients completed the study protocol without any significant morbidity or any mortality. Perioperative variables, including blood loss, transfusion rate, operative time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and hospital charges, were all significantly less (P < 0.05) in this study group compared with children with the same diagnosis treated with cranial vault reshaping during the same period. Furthermore, the preoperative mean cephalic index of 64.3 corrected to 77.6 after surgery and was maintained over time. Spring-mediated cranial reshaping is efficacious and safe for the treatment of sagittal synostosis. Long-term study of cranial development and clinical morphology are ongoing to validate further the effectiveness of this treatment modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346023     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200409000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Adaptation of the cranium to spring cranioplasty forces.

Authors:  Charles Davis; Per Windh; Claes G K Lauritzen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Ventricular shunt complications in patients undergoing posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Anthony Azzolini; Katie Magoon; Robin Yang; Scott Bartlett; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Geoffrey E Hespe; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Results of early surgery for sagittal suture synostosis: long-term follow-up and the occurrence of raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Marie-Lise C van Veelen; Oscar H J Eelkman Rooda; Tim de Jong; Ruben Dammers; Leon N A van Adrichem; Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Correction of nonsynostotic scaphocephaly without cranial osteotomy: spring expansion of the sagittal suture.

Authors:  Charles Davis; Agadha Wickremesekera; Martin R MacFarlane
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Use of tranexamic acid in craniosynostosis surgery.

Authors:  Justin P Martin; Jessica S Wang; Kasandra R Hanna; Madeline M Stovall; Kant Y Lin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

7.  Current Trends in Management of Nonsyndromic Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Christophe Moderie; Alexander Govshievich; Frank Papay; Jeffrey Fearon; Arun Gosain; Gaby Doumit
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-16

Review 8.  Distraction Osteogenesis Update: Introduction of Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Akira Gomi; Ataru Sunaga; Hideaki Kamochi; Hirofumi Oguma; Yasushi Sugawara
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.