Literature DB >> 18839187

Correction of nonsynostotic scaphocephaly without cranial osteotomy: spring expansion of the sagittal suture.

Charles Davis1, Agadha Wickremesekera, Martin R MacFarlane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scaphocephaly is usually due to sagittal synostosis. Scaphocephaly may also be seen in the presence of a nonsynostosed sagittal suture. In this situation traditional surgery is controversial due to the altered risk-benefit profile. This paper reports the first known series of patients with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly treated using spring assisted expansion of the sagittal suture.
METHODS: All patients referred to our craniofacial program over the period February 2005-February 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Eleven patients were seen with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly. Seven patients underwent spring expansion of the sagittal suture without osteotomy.
RESULTS: Four female and three male patients had spring expansion of a patent sagittal suture. Four patients were born prematurely. Two patients had Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome. The ages ranged from 6 to 26 months (mean 12 months). The average preoperative cranial index was 66 (range 63-67). This improved to 76 at the time of spring removal (range 73-78). Springs were kept in situ for an average of 7.25 months. The mean blood loss was 7 ml and the mean operative time 36 min.
CONCLUSION: Spring cranioplasty for sagittal synostosis is ideally performed before 6 months of age however in nonsynostotic scaphocephaly older children can be considered due to the absence of frontal bossing. Significant aesthetic improvement was achieved in all cases and normalization of the cranial index was achieved in 86% of cases with minimal morbidity and no significant complications. This technique is an alternative for nonsynostotic cases that were previously either untreated or undergone major remodelling surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18839187     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0719-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  16 in total

1.  Skull base expansion: craniofacial effects.

Authors:  J A Persing; E P Morgan; A J Cronin; W P Wolcott
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases.

Authors:  Claes G K Lauritzen; Charles Davis; Anna Ivarsson; Claire Sanger; Timothy D Hewitt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Nonsynostotic scaphocephaly: the so-called sticky sagittal suture.

Authors:  James E Baumgartner; Kelly Seymour-Dempsey; John F Teichgraeber; James J Xia; Amy L Waller; Jaime Gateno
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Effect of tensile force magnitude on release of cranial suture cells into S phase.

Authors:  W B Hickory; R Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Changes in the biomechanical properties of the rat interparietal suture incident to continuous tensile force application.

Authors:  E Tanaka; Y Miyawaki; R del Pozo; K Tanne
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  Spring-assisted cranioplasty vs pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis--a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Per Windh; Charles Davis; Claire Sanger; Pelle Sahlin; Claes Lauritzen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Spring-assisted remodeling for ventricular shunt-induced cranial deformity.

Authors:  Charles Davis; Claes G K Lauritzen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Successful distraction osteogenesis across a growing cranial suture without an osteotomy.

Authors:  T H Tung; B R Robertson; J M Winograd; T Mullick; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Identifying reproducible patterns of calvarial dysmorphology in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis may affect operative intervention and outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Rodney E Schmelzer; Chad A Perlyn; Alex A Kane; Thomas K Pilgram; Daniel Govier; Jeffrey L Marsh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Spring-mediated cranioplasty compared with the modified pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  José Guimarães-Ferreira; Fredrik Gewalli; Lisa David; Robert Olsson; Hans Friede; Claes G K Lauritzen
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2003
View more
  4 in total

1.  Adaptation of the cranium to spring cranioplasty forces.

Authors:  Charles Davis; Per Windh; Claes G K Lauritzen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Neurodevelopmental functioning of infants with untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy.

Authors:  Annette C Da Costa; Vicki A Anderson; Ravi Savarirayan; Jacquie A Wrennall; David K Chong; Anthony D Holmes; Andrew L Greensmith; John G Meara
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis: estimated increases in intracranial volume.

Authors:  Willy S Serlo; Leena P Ylikontiola; Niina Lähdesluoma; Olli-Pekka Lappalainen; Jarkko Korpi; Jani Verkasalo; George K B Sàndor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Leena P Ylikontiola; George K Sándor; Niina Salokorpi; Willy S Serlo
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.