Literature DB >> 15344338

Advance directives. Good, bad or indifferent.

Erich H Loewy1.   

Abstract

The author writes about various alternatives once decisional capacity is lost. So-called advance directives come in two forms: the living will and an appointed proxy for health care. The US--were these have been legally binding for over 20 years in all states--is a useful laboratory for studying the effect. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In some civilizations decisions about all such matters are made in different ways--these are not superior or inferior but simply different. In the US with its shameful social conditions for a large part of the population more important problems need to be addressed. In civilizations which have at least basic medical care for all, discussing such documents becomes far more important. The EU is likely to make some form of advance directive have legal standing. The last 20 or more years that they have been utilized in the US may provide experience important for the time when the EU also makes such documents legally binding.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15344338     DOI: 10.1007/BF03040927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prospective autonomy and critical interests: a narrative defense of the moral authority of advance directives.

Authors:  B A Rich
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Patient, physician, and family member understanding of living wills.

Authors:  Anupama Upadya; Visvanathan Muralidharan; Natalya Thorevska; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong; Constantine A Manthous
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-09-11       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Why don't emergency department patients have advance directives?

Authors:  I Llovera; M F Ward; J G Ryan; M Lesser; A E Sama; D Crough; M Mansfield; L I Lesser
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Competency to give an informed consent. A model for making clinical assessments.

Authors:  J F Drane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The many faces of competency.

Authors:  J F Drane
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Waiver of informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and the problem of unjust families and traditions.

Authors:  Insoo Hyun
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Advance treatment directives for people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Leslie Anne Campbell; Steve R Kisely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.