Literature DB >> 10530666

Why don't emergency department patients have advance directives?

I Llovera1, M F Ward, J G Ryan, M Lesser, A E Sama, D Crough, M Mansfield, L I Lesser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 1997 the authors determined that only 27% of their adult ED patients had advance directives (ADs). The purpose of this follow-up study was to determine the reasons why their adult ED patients do not have ADs.
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients from a convenience sample of representative shifts in the ED selected over a three-month period. Survey questions included demographic information, whether the patients had a life-threatening medical problem, whether they had an AD, with whom they had discussed their ADs, and the reasons why they did not have an AD. We excluded those who refused participation or who were incapacitated (i.e., any patient with a condition that precluded him or her from answering the questionnaire himself or herself, such as an altered level of consciousness, dementia, mental retardation, or inability to understand English).
RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six subjects were enrolled during the study period from an ED census of 816 adult patients. Three hundred forty patients were not included in the study for the following reasons: inability to complete the survey, refusal to participate, or not being approached by the interviewers. Of those enrolled, 77% of the patients did not have an AD (females, 73%; males, 80%). The most frequent reasons given for not having an AD were: 40% never thought about it, 24% preferred family to make the decision, and 23% were procrastinating. Factors jointly predictive of having an AD were older age, having a specialist, having a life-threatening medical problem, and not being Catholic. Patients who had ADs were discussing their ADs with their primary care physicians (PCPs) only 5% of the time.
CONCLUSION: Many patients, even when they have life-threatening medical problems, do not have an AD, and several reasons for this have been identified. Few of these ED patients who had ADs had discussed them with their physicians. Further studies should assess whether more physician intervention would increase the percentage of patients who have ADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530666     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  Advance directives. Good, bad or indifferent.

Authors:  Erich H Loewy
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  The ethics of surgery in the elderly demented patient with bowel obstruction.

Authors:  P Gallagher; K Clark
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Do-not-resuscitate orders and related factors among family surrogates of patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Cheng; Jing-Jy Wang; Kuan-Han Wu; Shan Huang; Mei- Ling Kuo; Chao-Hui Su
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  An overview of end-of-life issues in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Thomas J Papadimos; Yasdet Maldonado; Ravi S Tripathi; Deven S Kothari; Andrew L Rosenberg
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  End-of-life issues in the acute and critically ill patient.

Authors:  Eric A Savory; Catherine A Marco
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.