Literature DB >> 15343418

American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them?

Lorraine Silver Wallace1, Elizabeth S Lennon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A large proportion of US adults struggle with limited literacy skills, which affect their ability to fully function in health care settings. This study evaluated the readability of English language American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) patient education materials.
METHODS: A random sample of 171 AAFP patient education materials was selected from a list of 518 health topics available via the Internet. The SMOG grade formula was used to measure readability of the written patient education materials.
RESULTS: The mean SMOG grade level of AAFP patient education materials was 9.43 +/- 1.31 (range=6-12). This is higher than the average reading skills of US adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support and extend the findings of other readability studies across many medical specialties, all of which find that patient education materials are written at a difficulty level that is too high. The AAFP and individual family physicians should strive to improve communication with their patients by providing educational materials that are written at an appropriate reading level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15343418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  16 in total

1.  Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.

Authors:  Lauren M Stossel; Nora Segar; Peter Gliatto; Robert Fallar; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of the Doctor-Patient Relationship.

Authors:  Fallon E Chipidza; Rachel S Wallwork; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-10-22

3.  Challenges in making therapeutic lifestyle changes among hypercholesterolemic African-American patients and their physicians.

Authors:  Rhonda Dailey; Kendra L Schwartz; Juliann Binienda; Jessica Moorman; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Samuel A Taylor; Ronak M Patel; Moira M McCarthy; Timothy R Roberts; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-12

5.  Health information disparities? determining the relationship between age, poverty, and rate of calls to a consumer and patient health information service.

Authors:  Sandy Oelschlegel; Martha Earl; Melanie Taylor; Robert A Muenchen
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-07

6.  Health literacy: a necessity for increasing participation in health care.

Authors:  Joanne Protheroe; Don Nutbeam; Gill Rowlands
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Readability assessment of patient-provider electronic messages in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Jacob B Mirsky; Lina Tieu; Courtney Lyles; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population.

Authors:  David P Miller; John G Spangler; L Doug Case; David C Goff; Sonal Singh; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  The internet as a source of information for De Quervain's tendinitis.

Authors:  James C Heap; Bobby Dezfuli; David M Bennett; Eric Chapman; Gregory L DeSilva
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

10.  Consumer's Perception on Design and Layout of Consumer Medical Information Leaflets on Obesity and Lipid Lowering Drugs.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Mathew; Kingston Rajiah; Krishana Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.