OBJECTIVE: Infants undergoing eye exams to screen for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) demonstrate physiologic and behavioral manifestations of pain and distress. Oral sucrose has analgesic properties that might reduce these effects. AIM: To determine the efficacy of oral sucrose in reducing the pain/distress of eye exams for ROP. METHODS: A total of 32 infants about to undergo ROP screening exams received either oral sucrose [S] (N=16) or sterile water [C] (N=16) in a randomized, prospective and blinded fashion. Outcome measures included HR, RR, O(2) saturation, BP, pain (premature infant pain profile) and percent of time spent crying during the eye exam. RESULTS: The groups were similar in GA (weeks) (28+/-1.6), BW (kg) (1.04+/-0.26), postnatal age (days) 50.8+/-20.3, and study weight (kg) 1.88+/-0.40). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in HR, BP, and pain score in response to the exam. Infants in both groups spent the majority of time actively crying during the exam ([S] 53+/-35% vs [C] 63+/-31%. Infants receiving [S] showed a small but significant drop in O(2) saturation. No significant differences were seen between groups in physiologic or behavioral responses to the eye exam. CONCLUSION:Oral [S] was not effective in reducing pain/distress from the ROP screening exam. Alternative strategies should be considered to achieve adequate pain relief.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Infants undergoing eye exams to screen for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) demonstrate physiologic and behavioral manifestations of pain and distress. Oral sucrose has analgesic properties that might reduce these effects. AIM: To determine the efficacy of oral sucrose in reducing the pain/distress of eye exams for ROP. METHODS: A total of 32 infants about to undergo ROP screening exams received either oral sucrose [S] (N=16) or sterile water [C] (N=16) in a randomized, prospective and blinded fashion. Outcome measures included HR, RR, O(2) saturation, BP, pain (premature infantpain profile) and percent of time spent crying during the eye exam. RESULTS: The groups were similar in GA (weeks) (28+/-1.6), BW (kg) (1.04+/-0.26), postnatal age (days) 50.8+/-20.3, and study weight (kg) 1.88+/-0.40). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in HR, BP, and pain score in response to the exam. Infants in both groups spent the majority of time actively crying during the exam ([S] 53+/-35% vs [C] 63+/-31%. Infants receiving [S] showed a small but significant drop in O(2) saturation. No significant differences were seen between groups in physiologic or behavioral responses to the eye exam. CONCLUSION: Oral [S] was not effective in reducing pain/distress from the ROP screening exam. Alternative strategies should be considered to achieve adequate pain relief.
Authors: Christoph Bührer; Ömer Erdeve; Anton van Kaam; Angelika Berger; Evelyn Lechner; Benjamin Bar-Oz; Karel Allegaert; Tom Stiris; İstemi Han Çelik; Janet Berrington Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Dan Ni Wang; Kyla Lavery; Stacey Dalgleish; Alexandra Howlett; Vivian E Hill; Stephanie A Dotchin Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: David L Rogers; Don L Bremer; Rae R Fellows; Agnieshka Baumritter; Ebenezer Daniel; Max Pastilli; Gui-Shang Ying; Graham E Quinn Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Natalia F Callaway; Cassie A Ludwig; Mark S Blumenkranz; Jennifer Michelle Jones; Douglas R Fredrick; Darius M Moshfeghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Grace M Richter; Steven L Williams; Justin Starren; John T Flynn; Michael F Chiang Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: E M Boyle; Y Freer; Z Khan-Orakzai; M Watkinson; E Wright; J R Ainsworth; N McIntosh Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 5.747