Literature DB >> 15342835

Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.

Neil N Finer1, Waldemar A Carlo, Shahnaz Duara, Avroy A Fanaroff, Edward F Donovan, Linda L Wright, Sarah Kandefer, W Kenneth Poole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although earlier studies have suggested that early continuous airway positive pressure (CPAP) may be beneficial in reducing ventilator dependence and subsequent chronic lung disease in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infant, the time of initiation of CPAP has varied, and there are no prospective studies of infants who have received CPAP or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from initial resuscitation in the delivery room (DR). Current practice for the ELBW infant includes early intubation and the administration of prophylactic surfactant, often in the DR. The feasibility of initiating CPAP in the DR and continuing this therapy without intubation for surfactant has never been determined prospectively in a population of ELBW infants. This study was designed to determine the feasibility of randomizing ELBW infants of <28 weeks' gestation to CPAP/PEEP or no CPAP/PEEP during resuscitation immediately after delivery, avoiding routine DR intubation for surfactant administration, initiating CPAP on neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and assessing compliance with subsequent intubation criteria.
METHODS: Infants who were of <28 weeks' gestation, who were born in 5 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network NICUs from July 2002 to January 2003, and for whom a decision had been made to provide full treatment after birth were randomized to receive either CPAP/PEEP or not using a neonatal T-piece resuscitator (NeoPuff). Infants would not be intubated for the sole purpose of surfactant administration in the DR. After admission to the NICU, all nonintubated infants were placed on CPAP and were to be intubated for surfactant administration only after meeting specific criteria: a fraction of inspired oxygen of >0.3 with an oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter of <90% and/or an arterial oxygen pressure of <45 mm Hg, an arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of >55 mm Hg, or apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation.
RESULTS: A total of 104 infants were enrolled over a 6-month period: 55 CPAP and 49 control infants. No infant was intubated in the DR for the exclusive purpose of surfactant administration. Forty-seven infants were intubated for resuscitation in the DR: 27 of 55 CPAP infants and 20 of 49 control infants. Only 4 of the 43 infants who had a birth weight of <700 g and 3 of the 37 infants of <25 weeks' gestation were resuscitated successfully without positive pressure ventilation, and no difference was observed between the treatment groups. All infants of 23 weeks' gestation required intubation in the DR, irrespective of treatment group, whereas only 3 (14%) of 21 infants of 27 weeks' required such intubation. For infants who were not intubated in the DR, 36 infants (16 CPAP infants and 20 control infants) were subsequently intubated in the NICU by day 7, in accordance with the protocol. Overall, 80% of studied infants required intubation within the first 7 days of life. The care provided for 52 (95%) of 55 CPAP infants and 43 (88%) of the 49 control infants was in compliance with the study protocol, with an overall compliance of 91%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that infants could be randomized successfully to a DR intervention of CPAP/PEEP compared with no CPAP/PEEP, with intubation provided only for resuscitation indications, and subsequent intubation for prespecified criteria. Forty-five percent (47 of 104) of infants <28 weeks' gestation required intubation for resuscitation in the DR. CPAP/PEEP in the DR did not affect the need for intubation at birth or during the subsequent week. Overall, 20% of infants did not need intubation by 7 days of life. This experience should be helpful in facilitating the design of subsequent prospective studies of ventilatory support in ELBW infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15342835     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-0394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  46 in total

1.  Tidal volume delivery during surfactant administration in the delivery room.

Authors:  Georg M Schmölzer; C Omar F Kamlin; Jennifer A Dawson; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Pinching, electrocution, ravens' beaks, and positive pressure ventilation: a brief history of neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  C P F O'Donnell; A T Gibson; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  To intubate or not--that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants.

Authors:  N Finer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Noninvasive inhaled nitric oxide does not prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature newborns.

Authors:  John P Kinsella; Gary R Cutter; Robin H Steinhorn; Leif D Nelin; William F Walsh; Neil N Finer; Steven H Abman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Does the use of primary continuous positive airway pressure reduce the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in infants ≤32 weeks' gestation?

Authors:  Wendy H Yee; Jeanne Scotland; Yung Pham; Robert Finch
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  The role of surfactant and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in early management of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants.

Authors:  Narayan Prabhu Iyer; Maroun Jean Mhanna
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  Effects of delivery room quality improvement on premature infant outcomes.

Authors:  W Lapcharoensap; M V Bennett; R J Powers; N N Finer; L P Halamek; J B Gould; P J Sharek; H C Lee
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Delivery Room Intubations in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Kakkilaya; Ihab Jubran; Vaishali Mashruwala; Emma Ramon; Valerie N Simcik; Marjory Marshall; L Steven Brown; Mambarambath A Jaleel; Vishal S Kapadia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Perinatal management: What has been learned through the network?

Authors:  Sanjay Chawla; Elizabeth E Foglia; Vishal Kapadia; Myra H Wyckoff
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  Antenatal and postnatal corticosteroid and resuscitation induced lung injury in preterm sheep.

Authors:  Noah H Hillman; J Jane Pillow; Molly K Ball; Graeme R Polglase; Suhas G Kallapur; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.