Literature DB >> 15342717

Kinematic and kinetic constraints on arm, trunk, and leg segments in target-reaching movements.

James S Thomas1, Daniel M Corcos, Ziaul Hasan.   

Abstract

We studied target reaching tasks involving not only the arms but also the trunk and legs, which necessitated some trunk flexion. Such tasks can be successfully completed using an infinite number of combinations of segment motions due to the inherent kinematic redundancy with the excessive degrees of freedom (DOFs). Sagittal plane motions of six segments (shank, thigh, pelvis, trunk, humerus, and forearm) and dynamic torques of six joints (ankle, knee, hip, lumbar, shoulder, and elbow) were analyzed separately by principal component (PC) analyses to determine if there was a commonality among the shapes of the respective waveforms. Additionally, PC analyses were used to probe for constraining relationships among the 1) relative magnitudes of segment excursions and 2) the peak-to-peak dynamic joint torques. In summary, at the kinematic level, the tasks are simplified by the use of a single common waveform for all segment excursions with 89.9% variance accounted for (VAF), but with less fixed relationships among the relative scaling of the magnitude of segment excursions (62.2% VAF). However, at the kinetic level, the time course of the dynamic joint torques are not well captured by a single waveform (72.7% VAF), but the tasks are simplified by relatively fixed relationships among the scaling of dynamic joint torque magnitudes across task conditions (94.7% VAF). Taken together, these results indicate that, while the effective DOFs in a multi-joint task are reduced differently at the kinematic and kinetic levels, they both contribute to simplifying the neural control of these tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15342717     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00582.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Variant and invariant features characterizing natural and reverse whole-body pointing movements.

Authors:  Enrico Chiovetto; Laura Patanè; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Gary E Gibson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics.

Authors:  Silvia Hua; Julia A Leonard; Alicia J Hilderley; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor primitives of pointing movements in a three-dimensional workspace.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Torque response to external perturbation during unconstrained goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Examination of the Lumbar Movement Pattern during a Clinical Test and a Functional Activity Test in People with and without Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Andrej V Marich; Ching-Ting Hwang; Christopher J Sorensen; Linda R van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  E Reghem; L Chèze; Y Coppens; E Pouydebat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Resolving kinematic redundancy in target-reaching movements with and without external constraint.

Authors:  Dongpyo Lee; Daniel M Corcos; Jonathan Shemmell; Sue Leurgans; Ziaul Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Feasibility and Safety of a Virtual Reality Dodgeball Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Christopher R France; Megan E Applegate; Samuel T Leitkam; Stevan Walkowski
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.