Literature DB >> 15341796

The effects of hippocampal lesions on learning, memory, and reward expectancies.

Lisa M Savage1, Robert A Buzzetti, Donna R Ramirez.   

Abstract

The hippocampus appears to be critical for the formation of certain types of memories. Hippocampal-lesioned animals fail to exhibit some spatial, contextual, and relational associations. After aspiration lesions of the hippocampus and/or cortex, male rats were allowed to recover for three weeks before being trained on a matching-to-position task. The matching-to-position task was altered to influence the type of cognitive strategies a subject would use to solve the task. The main behavioral manipulation was the reinforcement contingency assignment: Use of a differential outcomes procedure (DOP) or a nondifferential outcomes procedure (NOP). The DOP involves correlating each to-be-remembered event with a distinct reward condition via Pavlovian trace conditioning, whereas the NOP results in random reward contingency. We found that hippocampal lesions did retard learning the matching rule, regardless of the reinforcement contingency assignment. However, when delay intervals were added to the task memory performance of subjects with hippocampal lesions was dramatically impaired--if subjects were not trained with the DOP. When subjects were trained with the DOP, the hippocampal lesion had a marginal effect on delayed memory performance. These findings demonstrate two important points regarding lesions of the hippocampus: (1) hippocampal lesions have a minimal effect on the on the ability of rats to use reward information to solve a delayed discrimination task; (2) rats with hippocampal lesions have the ability to learn about reward information using Pavlovian trace conditioning procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15341796     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  16 in total

1.  Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and use of reward expectancies.

Authors:  Donna R Ramirez; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Learning-related facilitation of rhinal interactions by medial prefrontal inputs.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Elizabeth P Bauer; Denis Paré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Measuring correlations and interactions among four simultaneously recorded brain regions during learning.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Elizabeth P Bauer; Denis Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Pediatric Brain Development in Down Syndrome: A Field in Its Infancy.

Authors:  Taralee Hamner; Manisha D Udhnani; Karol Z Osipowicz; Nancy Raitano Lee
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Memory for reward location is enhanced even though acetylcholine efflux within the amygdala is impaired in rats with damage to the diencephalon produced by thiamine deficiency.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Sabrina Guarino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching.

Authors:  Luis J Fuentes; Jie Sui; Angeles F Estévez; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

Review 7.  Reward expectation alters learning and memory: the impact of the amygdala on appetitive-driven behaviors.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Raddy L Ramos
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Basolateral amygdala inactivation by muscimol, but not ERK/MAPK inhibition, impairs the use of reward expectancies during working memory.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Andrew D Koch; Donna R Ramirez
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Hippocampal lesions facilitate instrumental learning with delayed reinforcement but induce impulsive choice in rats.

Authors:  Timothy H C Cheung; Rudolf N Cardinal
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Spatial working memory is enhanced in children by differential outcomes.

Authors:  Laura Esteban; Ana B Vivas; Luis J Fuentes; Angeles F Estévez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.