Literature DB >> 15340265

Impact of a cancer registry-based genealogy service to support clinical genetics services.

David H Brewster1, Alison Fordyce, Roger J Black.   

Abstract

In collaboration with the network of genetics clinics in Scotland, a brief questionnaire was designed to gather data prospectively about the impact of information arising from pedigree research provided by Scottish Cancer Registry personnel. Pedigree research in Scotland is facilitated by access to public records of births, deaths, marriages, and historic census returns up to 1901, and enables the construction of accurate and extensive family pedigrees encompassing generations beyond the detailed knowledge of the proband. Subject to existing confidentiality guidelines, linkage of these pedigrees to cancer registration records results in a more comprehensive family history including the age at diagnosis of any cancer, multiple primary cancers, and cancers unreported from death certificates. Of 454 requests for pedigree research completed between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2003, questionnaires were returned for 425 (94%). The information fed back to genetics clinics led to changes in family history, risk categorisation, and management in 41%, 30%, and 23% of cases, respectively. Management advice altered in both directions, that is, to institute active follow-up and surveillance of clinic attendees and their relatives where none was previously envisaged, and viceversa. The interests of current and future generations of patients concerned about their familial risk of cancer will be served by measures which enable cancer registries to collect data that are as accurate and complete as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15340265     DOI: 10.1023/B:FAME.0000039865.29247.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  3 in total

1.  Cancer information under threat: the case for legislation.

Authors:  D H Brewster; M P Coleman; D Forman; M Roche
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Benefits from specialised cancer care.

Authors:  P Selby; C Gillis; R Haward
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D Brewster; H Campbell; M E M Porteous; A H Wyllie; C C Bird; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of referrals to a multi-disciplinary breast cancer genetics clinic: practical and economic considerations.

Authors:  Marta M Reis; Dorothy Young; Lorna McLeish; David Goudie; Alan Cook; Frank Sullivan; Helen Vysny; Alison Fordyce; Roger Black; Manouche Tavakoli; Michael Steel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  The use of genealogy databases for risk assessment in genetic health service: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vigdis Stefansdottir; Oskar Th Johannsson; Heather Skirton; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Hrafn Tulinius; Jon J Jonsson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-07-18

3.  Counsellee's experience of cancer genetic counselling with pedigrees that automatically incorporate genealogical and cancer database information.

Authors:  Vigdis Stefansdottir; Oskar Th Johannsson; Heather Skirton; Jon J Jonsson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-02

4.  The Teesside cancer family history service: change management and innovation at cancer network level.

Authors:  Paul Brennan; Oonagh Claber; Tracey Shaw
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Familial breast cancer: management of 'lower risk' referrals.

Authors:  D Young; L McLeish; F Sullivan; M Pitkethly; M Reis; D Goudie; H Vysny; G Ozakinci; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.