Literature DB >> 15337865

First experience in human beings with a permanently implantable intrasac pressure transducer for monitoring endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Sharif H Ellozy1, Alfio Carroccio, Robert A Lookstein, Michael E Minor, Claudie M Sheahan, Jacob Juta, Andrew Cha, Rolando Valenzuela, Michael D Addis, Tikva S Jacobs, Victoria J Teodorescu, Michael L Marin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) prevents rupture by excluding the aneurysm sac from systemic arterial pressure. Current surveillance protocols after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) follow secondary markers of sac pressurization, namely, endoleak and sac enlargement. We report the first clinical experience with the use of a permanently implantable, ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer to measure intrasac pressure after EVAR.
METHODS: Over 7 months, 14 patients underwent EVAR of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with implantation of an ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer fixed to the outside of the stent graft and exposed to the excluded aortic sac. Twelve patients received modular bifurcated stent grafts, and 2 patients received aortouniiliac devices. Intrasac pressures were measured directly with an intravascular catheter and by the remote sensor at stent-graft deployment. Follow-up sac pressures were measured with a remote sensor and correlated with systemic arterial pressure at every follow-up visit. Mean follow-up was 2.6 +/-1.9 months.
RESULTS: Excellent concordance was found between catheter-derived and transducer-derived intrasac pressssure intraoperatively. Pulsatile waveforms were seen in all functioning transducers at each evaluation interval. One implant ceased to function at 2 months of follow-up. In 1 patient a type I endoleak was diagnosed on 1-month computed tomography (CT) scans; 3 type II endoleaks were observed. Those patients with complete exclusion of the aneurysm on CT scans had a significant difference in systemic and sac systolic pressures initially (P <.001) and at 1 month (P <.001). Initial sac diastolic pressures were higher than systemic diastolic pressures (P <.001). The ratio of systemic to sac systolic pressure increased over time in those patients with complete aneurysm exclusion ( P <.001). Four of 6 patients with no endoleak and greater than 1-month follow-up had diminution of sac systolic pressure to 40 mm Hg or less by 3 months.
CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a totally implantable chronic pressure transducer to monitor the results of EVAR in human beings. Aneurysm exclusion leads to gradual diminution of sac pressure over several months. Additional clinical follow-up will be necessary to determine whether aneurysm sac pressure monitoring can replace CT in the long-term surveillance of patients after EVAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15337865     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

Review 1.  Microelectromechanical systems and nephrology: the next frontier in renal replacement technology.

Authors:  Steven Kim; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.620

2.  Significance of initial aortic aneurysm pressure sensor readings varies with aortic endograft design.

Authors:  Gautam Shrikhande; Sikandar Khan; Hafiz Hussain; Alicia Menezes; James McKinsey; Harry Bush
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Endovascular approach to acute aortic trauma.

Authors:  Riyad Karmy-Jones; Desarom Teso; Nicole Jackson; Lisa Ferigno; Robert Bloch
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

4.  A Wireless Embedded Sensor based on Magnetic Higher-order Harmonic Fields: Application to Liquid Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Ee Lim Tan; Brandon D Pereles; Keat Ghee Ong
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.301

5.  Aortic aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair using an implantable remote sensor: initial experience and short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Hanno Hoppe; Jocelyn A Segall; Timothy K Liem; Gregory J Landry; John A Kaufman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Biomaterials-based electronics: polymers and interfaces for biology and medicine.

Authors:  Meredith Muskovich; Christopher J Bettinger
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Techniques in endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Sachin V Phade; Manuel Garcia-Toca; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2011-10-25

8.  Detecting endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair with a minimally invasive, implantable, telemetric pressure sensor: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Roland Schlierf; Joachim-Georg Pfeffer; Andreas H Mahnken; Uwe Schnakenberg; Thomas Schmitz-Rode
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  Implantable Biosensors for Real-time Strain and Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Ee Lim Tan; Brandon D Pereles; Brock Horton; Ranyuan Shao; Mohammed Zourob; Keat Ghee Ong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Correlation between intrasac pressure measurements of a pressure sensor and an angiographic catheter during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Pierre Galvagni Silveira; Christopher William Teixeira Miller; Rafael Freygang Mendes; Gilberto Nascimento Galego
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.