PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the difference between conventionally fractionated (CF) and hyperfractionated (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT), with and without either daily cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA), in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) enrolled onto two consecutive prospective randomized studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of CF RT (70 Gy, group 1), CF RT and either daily CDDP (6 mg/m2) or daily CBDCA (25 mg/m2; group 2), Hfx RT (77 Gy, 1.1 Gy bid; group 3), or Hfx RT and daily CDDP (group 4). RESULTS: Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than any other group. There was an insignificant difference favoring Hfx RT over CF RT, either alone or in combination with CDDP or CBDCA, regarding both OS (P =.058 and P =.051, respectively) and LRFS (P =.088 and P =.091, respectively). No difference was seen between CF RT plus chemotherapy (CHT) and Hfx RT alone regarding either OS (P =.32) or LRFS (P =.48). Regional recurrence-free survival was similar in the four treatment groups. CF RT plus CHT and Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better distant metastasis-free survival than CF RT and Hfx RT. High-grade toxicity was significantly more frequent in Hfx RT plus CDDP than in any other group, except in the Hfx RT group. Hfx RT led to significantly more acute toxicity and xerostomia than CF RT plus CHT. Hfx RT was more toxic than CF RT, either alone or with concurrent CHT. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that there may be a therapeutic benefit for CF RT plus CHT over Hfx RT plus CDDP in patients with SCCHN, but this cannot be firmly established without a larger and well-planned controlled trial.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the difference between conventionally fractionated (CF) and hyperfractionated (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT), with and without either daily cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA), in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) enrolled onto two consecutive prospective randomized studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of CF RT (70 Gy, group 1), CF RT and either daily CDDP (6 mg/m2) or daily CBDCA (25 mg/m2; group 2), Hfx RT (77 Gy, 1.1 Gy bid; group 3), or Hfx RT and daily CDDP (group 4). RESULTS: Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than any other group. There was an insignificant difference favoring Hfx RT over CF RT, either alone or in combination with CDDP or CBDCA, regarding both OS (P =.058 and P =.051, respectively) and LRFS (P =.088 and P =.091, respectively). No difference was seen between CF RT plus chemotherapy (CHT) and Hfx RT alone regarding either OS (P =.32) or LRFS (P =.48). Regional recurrence-free survival was similar in the four treatment groups. CF RT plus CHT and Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better distant metastasis-free survival than CF RT and Hfx RT. High-grade toxicity was significantly more frequent in Hfx RT plus CDDP than in any other group, except in the Hfx RT group. Hfx RT led to significantly more acute toxicity and xerostomia than CF RT plus CHT. Hfx RT was more toxic than CF RT, either alone or with concurrent CHT. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that there may be a therapeutic benefit for CF RT plus CHT over Hfx RT plus CDDP in patients with SCCHN, but this cannot be firmly established without a larger and well-planned controlled trial.
Authors: Jill Gilbert; Michelle A Rudek; Michaela J Higgins; Ming Zhao; Sara Bienvenu; Nancy Tsottles; Muhammad A Chaudhry; Richard Wahl; Arlene Forastiere; Maura Gillison Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Jan Bosch; Klaus Jung; Tobias Overbeck; Steffen Hennies; Christoph Matthias; Clemens F Hess; Ralph M Roedel; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Katherine Y Fan; Hrishikesh Gogineni; David Zaboli; Spencer Lake; Marianna L Zahurak; Simon R Best; Marshall A Levine; Mei Tang; Eva S Zinreich; John R Saunders; Joseph A Califano; Ray G Blanco; Sara I Pai; Barbara Messing; Patrick K Ha Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Patrick D Maguire; Michael Papagikos; Sue Hamann; Charles Neal; Martin Meyerson; Neil Hayes; Peter Ungaro; Kenneth Kotz; Marion Couch; Hoke Pollock; Joel Tepper Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andrean L Simons; Melissa A Fath; David M Mattson; Brian J Smith; Susan A Walsh; Michael M Graham; Richard D Hichwa; John M Buatti; Ken Dornfeld; Douglas R Spitz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038